Integration of Vocational Education and Training: Purposes, Practices and Principles, published 2018 by Springer, edited by Sarojni Choy,
Gun-Britt Warvik and Viveca Lindberg.
Disclaimer: I am the lead author of one of the chapters in
this book.
The overall premise of the book, is to bring a variety of
perspectives on the integration of study /vocational educational programmes
with work. Most of the chapters, focus on how to better help students, studying
in dual systems, or completing full-time study with components of work
integrated learning, bring the skills / knowledge and attitudes which demark
each context, into a complementary whole. Of note is the need to address the 'space in between' as formal study is structured through both intended and enacted curriculum and workplace learning is driven by work processes and objectives.
The book has 18 chapters in 2 parts. The first chapter sets the scene and provides an overview of the book's direction and contents. The last 2 chapters, provides a synthesis of the themes explored through various chapters and brings the commonalities and differences across the various contexts reported, into discussion.
Part 1: - 4 chapters on the provision and integration of
work experiences within vocational education
The first introductory chapter – integration between school
and work: developments, conceptions and applications – by the editors –
provides an overview of the premises of the book. This first chapter sets the
context for the following chapters in the book. The term ‘ integration’ is
discussed and historical development described. Various approaches towards
understanding integration are summarised. Including: three types of integration
– low road integration to assimilate skills and automate practice through
authentic work exposure; high road integration whereby reflection is engaged to
integrate knowledge and skills via ‘accommodation’; and transformative
integration, allowing for individuals’ perspectives to be changed as an outcome
of WIL. Fuller and Unwin’s restricted vs expansive participation is also used
as a framework for the affordances of learners to develop ‘integration’. The
boundary crossing concept is also another. Pedagogies of for integration of WIL
include the 7 dimension of purpose, context, nature of integration, curriculum
issues, learning, partnerships and support to students. WIL also requires
support for students’ learning before, during and after WIL.
As prefaced above, student’s agency is important to
achieving WIL goal. Chapter 2 is by S. Billett on student readiness and the
integration of experiences in practice and educational settings. The 8
dimension of readiness require addressing – conceptual, procedural and
dispositional (i.e. knowledge, skills and attitudes). Recommendations for
promoting student readiness before students engage with work placements and how
to ensure students’ integrate their experiences after work placements, are
detailed and discussed.
In the third chapter, D. Guile presents work experience and
VET: insights from the connective typology and the recontexualisation model.
This work is based on various models including bridge to work, experiential
learning, a generic model, work process and the connective model. The article
argues for a ‘continuous recontextualisation of knowledge and professional
practice model. Learning for occupation / work is seen to be a continual
process of adjusting to context, comingling of conceptual understanding and
professional experience and further workplace recontextualisation as work
evolves.
Chapter 4 by P. Grollman is on the topic of ‘varieties of
duality: work-based learning and vocational education in international
comparative research’. Calls for not only work to inform ‘school’ curriculum
but for work to be also influence by school learning contributions. Describes
various approaches across countries and unpacks the dualities in these systems.
Part 2, integrating work experiences within vocational
education: empirical cases – presents a range of international examples and
case studies.
Chapter 5 by S. Choy presents the Australian perspective
with ‘integration of learning in educational institutions and workplaces. Based
on a study on how VET students, teachers and managers/ coordinators
conceptualise connectivity between what is learnt at educational institutions
and workplaces. 4 conceptions are proposed. Experiences as preparation for
learning in different sites represents a more sequential / linear progression
from learning in education, and application to practice at work. A broader
perspective includes the opportunity to de-construct / reflect on how learning
and experiences from each (TAFE / workplace) inform or support each other. A
third perspective is to encompass the learning from both sites. A fourth is the
stimulation of higher-order thinking through the reflective cycle and the
opportunity to select or negotiate ways forward.
The next chapter by R. Smith, discusses the role of ‘learner
agency and the negotiation of practice’ is a summary of his PhD work. The main
argument is the opportunity for workers to use their learning to contribute to
the work process. There are many complex mechanisms in a workplace which can
support or dis-engage a worker from participation. Worker agency is a key as to
how, when and why workers engage. The negotiation of workers’ contributions is
held to be a role of workers’ decisions (agency) and enablement through
workplace practice. Each cannot occur without the other.
A Finnish example by L. Pylvas, H. Rintala and P. Nokelainen
on the topic of ‘integration of holistic development of apprentices’
competences’. Reports on a study of apprentices to gauge their integration into
the workplace. Found there was poor integration. Proposes the need to ensure
integration occurs and to support apprentices beyond skills training. In
particular to ensure they also are drawn into the culture of the workplace,
develop social and meta competence and become part of a workplace.
Then, an example from Iceland. E. Eiriksdottir writes on ‘variations
in implementing the dual VET systems: perspectives of students, teachers and
trainers in the certified trades’. Discusses the impact of economic,
socio/political, historical contributions to the length and sequencing of WIL
periods across trades apprenticeship programmes.
Chapter 9 is from a team at Ara Institute of Canterbury in
New Zealand. S. Chan, B. Beatty, D. Chilvers, L. Davis, A. Hollingworth and I.
Jamieson summarise the difference approaches to work integrated learning with
an emphasis on biculturalism. ‘WIL in Aotearoa/ New Zealand: Diversity,
biculturalism and industry-led. This chapter uses case study of a range of WIL
arrangements deployed by discipline specific programmes. Commonalities across
the programmes include the importance of WIL to provide authentic learning, an
emphasis on citizenship characteristics through preparation for the bi-cultural
nature of NZ, and crucial support from stakeholders. The historical legacies
from industry and discipline, contribute to how WIL is constituted.
Chapter 10 with K. Vaughan, presents work-based learning in
New Zealand with ‘even better than the real thing: practice-based learning and
vocational thresholds at work. Discusses the important grounding focus, if a
dispositional nature, of 3 disciplines. Carpenters with an emphasis on craft
work and the values of craftsmanship; development of an expertise of
uncertainty in general practitioner doctors; and development of a ‘social eye’
by engineering technicians. Each discipline, bringing to the development of
their apprentices / trainees, a specific approach and perspective.
L. C. Lahn and H. Nore write on ‘ePortfolios as hybrid
learning arenas in VET. Presents the work on using ePortfolios to be used as a
device for liaising with apprentices, training offices, schools and companies.
T. Nyen and A. H. Tonder present a chapter on the Norwegian
context with ‘Development of skills through integration of practice training
periods in school-based vocational education’. Discusses the pros and cons of school-based
and work-based learning. Each has its advantages and disadvantages.
The next chapter is from Singapore, with H. Bound, A. Chia
and W.C. Lee on ‘spaces and spaces ‘in-between’ – relations through pedagogical
tools and learning. Chronicles the integration of learning across different
spaces and intents. These affect the way curriculum is designed. Both work and
out of work learning yield potential and understanding the interrelationships
is a key. Therefore, the ‘place in-between’ work and off-work learning, is a
context which is now not utilised. The current shift to preparing workers for
the future of work, adds another dimension to the intersection and
interrelationships between work and learning.
I. Anderson writes on ‘workplace learning for school-based
apprenticeships: tripartite conversations as a boundary-crossing point’. Uses
activity theory to unravel the interconnections between vocational teacher,
workplace tutor and student. Boundary crossing is used to explain how plans and
negotiations, impact on learning at school and at work. The workplace expects
school to prepare students for work. However, a lack of congruence between
skills / knowledge learnt at school and workplace expectations, make it always
a challenge to meet the needs of both work and school learning.
Then G-B. Warvic and V. Lindberg present on ‘integration
between school and work: changes and challenges in the Swedish VET 1970-2011.
Another study using activity theory as a framework. Discusses the need to
ensure teachers are provided with opportunities to stay conversant with the
demands of the contemporary workplace. Teachers are then enabled to mediate
between what is expected of students work readiness learning and how this may
be actioned through school based learning.
A Swiss perspective is presented in chapter 16. V. Sappa, C.
Aprea and B. Vogt write on ‘success factors in fostering the connection between
learning in school and at the workplace’. Summarises the challenges for
vocational schools to assist apprentices to bridge the worlds of school and
work. The study reports on the many complex factors impinging on the
integration of work based and school based learning. As with chapter 13 in the
Singaporean context, a ‘third space’ which brings together work and school, is
explored as a means to provide better integration between formalised school and
‘less structured’ work based learning.
Chapter 17 by S. Billett, G-B. Warvik and S. Choy discusses
‘concepts, purposes and practices of integration across National curriculum’.
The chapter argues for the need to ensure there is integration, given the
importance of each sector (school and work) towards preparing people for work. The
importance of integration are reiterated. There is caution that the intended
curriculum – what is planned for students to achieve, learn or attain, does not
always transfer into the curriculum as experienced by learners. Learners’
outcomes, may not necessarily need to be constrained or universal, as the
discipline, location and societal contexts will differ. Issues identified
through the chapters in the book include the important role of individual
learner’s agency; institutional barriers including the different objectives of
‘school’ and work; the need to identify and provide learnable or teachable
moments as learners engage with work; and the length, sequencing and logistical
issues of organising work integrated learning. To resolve, it is important to
ensure readiness of students’ to learning beyond school; the issues of
connectivity and re-contextualisation between contexts are important to address
in assisting learners to understand and mediate between both; and the wider
contextual institutional issues also require resolution – with the need to
understand socio-politico-historical influences and to consider the means to
resolve or tamper their effects, if so required.
The last chapter by the editors, bring the various themes,
concepts and perspectives together with a challenge for the ‘consideration for
the integration of students’ experiences’. Summarises the various themes
presented through the book. In particular, the need for deliberate effort from
school-based / curriculum design / school or qualification systems, to be
cognisant of the challenges of integration. Proposes four imperatives: social-cultural
arrangements, negotiated curriculum, roles of various stakeholders and learner
preparedness. Considerations for improving the negotiated curriculum include
maximising and rationally implementing the perspectives gathered from
stakeholders for the enactment of integrations. Learner preparedness include
ensuring learners understand occupational and pertinent requirements;
recognising and navigating the passage through integration; and applying
appropriate pedagogical strategies.
Overall, the book contributes to a better understanding of how to assist learners (and educators) to 'cross the boundaries' of the various contexts they learn within. How to find conscensus or resolve differences between 'school learning' and work requirements through reflective or assisted learning processes is the key to better work integrated learning.