Last week was a quiet re-start to work for 2014. I fitted in catch up reading and video watching between tidying up a rejected journal article and starting 3 other articles. One video on my list was of Professor Jean Lave providing background on 'everyday life and learning. The video is one of a series from
University of California TV and archived on youtube. There are several videos from UCTV to catch up on and I will summarise the relevant ones to vocational education as I work through them.
First up, social anthropologist Jean
Lave argues that all theoretical problematics across the social sciences
include assumptions about learning, whether explicitly or not. She says that
learning is integral to conceptions of knowledge, inquiry, revolution, and
changing practice, to name a few. Accordingly, social scientists have
substantive stakes in the issue -- historical, cultural, spatial, political,
and social.
Began with saying each
book she has written, seems to explain things in previous books. Connects this
to her study of Via and Goa tailors where apprentices work with the whole
garment before eventually learning how to draft and cut cloth to make the
clothing.
We are always learning as
we go through life. Learning is complex and multi-dimensional. We are
apprentices to our own changing practice.
Apprenticeship still
associated with low tech, developmental world practice, operating in informal
economies. Apprenticeship contributes to craft work learning mainly associated
with manual skills and labour.
However, ethnographic
studies of craft practice has provided many conceptions on how we learn. Providing rich resources for understanding
the processes (developmental, social) provides for learning.
Instead of studying
technology, development and cognitive, but study the relationships between
craftsmanship, song and imagination. Making is thinking. What is the process of
making concrete things reveal about how we understand ourselves.
Knowledge cannot be
separated from how knowledge is used and produced. Kavale 1997 categorises bureaucratic
or pragmatic relations of theory and practice in research training, research
activity, theory of knowledge. Bureaucratic involves schools, methodology,
facts and rules and technical rational. The pragmatic is about apprenticeship,
craft and art, situated knowing and social practice.
Provides explanation of
how her research approaches started to lean towards understanding everyday
knowing in context as opposed to decontextualized general knowledge. Uses the
learning summarised in the book ‘apprenticeship in critical ethnographic
practice’ to explain of how she shifted to studying learning where it was
situated.
She tells the story of how
two sessions of field work was required for her to change her preconception of
learning as having to be formal. Eventually, she started to realise how
apprenticeship’s embodied curriculum revolved around learning by doing. Not
through formal show and tell but apprentices observing and participating in
authentic work tasks. Apprentices were not just learning how to sew buttons or
cut cloth, but turning themselves into master tailors.
A similar thing happened
when she tried to test tailor shop maths with formalised math based methods.
She realised she had never observed tailors actually using maths in a school
based algorithmic approach.
Learning is therefore
changing relationships between people in an ever changing world. The task is
not to investigate individuals, but the context and participatory practices as
they are enacted. Our artisan selves, are involved in continued search for ways
to solve everyday practices and beyond.
At the end, she made a
pitch for ‘slow science’, to adopt the dispositions of artisan, apprenticeship
and craftsmanship to do research, to resist the commodisation / commercialisation
and politicising of research.
In all, a good overview and revision for the principles presented and discussed in her book ' critical ethnographical practice''
No comments:
Post a Comment