Had time over the weekend (wet and snowy) to catch up on various accumulated links, readings and notes. One thread I followed through was on Wenger-Trayner's re-conceptualisation of the 'communities of practice' towards 'landscapes of practices'.
The newer conceptualisation of practice as landscape extends on the original premises of the socio-cultural foundation of learning. Communities of practices are linked, interconnected (loosely or tightly bound). Individuals traverse the landscape of practices as they enter and become part of specific communities of practices, often boundary crossing various communities due to the multi-disciplinary and multi-organisational nature of globalised organisations.
The book summarising all the arguments represents a good first port of call to review one's own understanding of how communities of practices have shifted. Parts of the book is on Google books. Book overview can be obtained at this blog by David Rubeli and book review summary with s Nordic slant.
Since publication, Dr. Wenger has delivered several conference addresses summarising the approaches of landscapes of practice. This powerpoint is similar to the one used at a presentation given in 2013 at the University of Manchester. Although about an hour long, worth a watch as the salient points are discussed.
In short, the concept of landscapes provides a refreshed view in light of the complexities now inherent in work organisation and the mobility of workers across discipline areas as their careers develop. Workers / learners have to continually negotiate / re-negotiate new perspectives as they are jostled from within their established Communities of Practice into being peripheral to others or their existing communities morph due to socio-political pressures. The journey is one across a landscape which is familiar but also includes gullies, unexpected turns and bluffs. Learning to walk through the landscape is now also as important as becoming part of the landscape.
Learning about elearning, m-learning, eportfolios, AI in VET, learning design and curriculum development. Also wanders across into research, including VET systems, workplace learning, apprenticeships, trades tutors and vocational identity formation. Plus meanderings into philosophy and neuroscience as I learn about how we learn. Usual disclaimers apply. This blog records my personal learning journey, experiences and thoughts and may not always be similar to the opinions of my employer.
Showing posts with label etienne wenger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label etienne wenger. Show all posts
Monday, August 10, 2015
Thursday, April 04, 2013
AVETRA 2013 day one morning
In Perth this week to attend and present at
the annual Australian Vocational Education and Training Training Research (AVETRA) Conference. Conference is at the
Esplanade Hotel in Fremantle, the cooler sea breezes temper the hot 30’C plus
temperatures Perth has had over the week. Wifi seems to be working, so should
be able to post through the conference.
Day
one opens with a welcome from AVETRA president, Dr. Michelle Simons along with
a welcome to country.
The first keynote is from Dr.EtienneWenger, who speaks on ‘Learning in and across landscapes of practice –
developments in social learning theory and implications of VET’.
Wenger’s approach is to view learning
as occurring across all aspects of everyday life and is social in nature.
Therefore, the ‘body of knowledge’ of a specialist area is reflected in the
practices of various communities of practice. Learning occupational skills is a
journey across the various practice communities leading to individual’s
vocational identity formation. His presentation provided background on his
original work with Jean Lave, how the study evolved. Their premises were
founded on Jean’s ethnographical studies on apprenticeship with learning viewed
as a trajectory into a community of practice (the legitimate peripheral
participation). Through learning, apprentices eventually belong to a community,
through engaging in practice, producing meaning from the experience and
attaining identity (becoming). Thus, the learning trajectory can be traced
through changes in identity as learners progress. However, communities of
practices cannot be designed as they arise organically through practitioners’
engagement and interaction. The ‘curriculum’ shifts to align with social,
political and organisational imperatives in unpredictable / idiosyncratic ways.
Approaches?? Competence is defined
within a COP – claims to competence negotiated in the politics of community
formation. Knowledgeability – defined in relation to a landscape of practice –
claims knowledgeabiliy negotiated in the politics of landscapes of practice. So
there needs to be a negotiation of identity in a complex landscape connecting
the individual to professional body, training, research in disciplines,
colleagues, clients, workplace and regulatory bodies. Not all of these
influences will be in congruence! Mechanisms include informal curriculums,
institutes, NGOs, bloggers, COPs, informal communities, personal networks,
twitter, google etc. becoming knowledgeable includes the need to modulation
across the many influences and mechanisms. Learning is still interface between
individual and the social contributions. Need to be shift from ‘curriculum’ to
skills to negotiate through. Within the landscape of practice building the
trajectory needs to include imagination (seeing the future, locating oneself);
engagement (crossing boundaries, being creative, going deep); and alignment
(making a difference, seeing a future).
Learning is therefore the need to ask regularly – who am I becoming? For VET practitioners – how can theory and
practice help learners and educators address the learning challenge of on-going
becoming /identity transformation.
After morning tea, concurrent sessions
begin (7 streams!) so as usual, will summarise the ones I attended and catch up
on the others (refereed papers) when I get back to NZ.
My presentation ‘ enhancing deliberate
reflective practice using situated technology enhanced learning with tablets’
is a summary of work with Debby Taylor. Improving the learning of hotel front
of house receptionists’ check-in and check out processes. Writing the paper for
this conference has helped to make more concrete, some of the learning we have
gained. The final report, which includes 2 more sub-projects, has now been
recently submitted to Ako Aotearoa for peer review.
I stay in the same stream ‘VET practice and attend Hugh Guthrie’s presentation on ‘institutionally based research and evaluation to advise practice: messages and lessons from three projects’. Based on Hugh’s work at the University of Victoria in Melbourne. The projects were to introduce a new approach to trades training - TradeApps; study of youth strategy programme for students who had not completed year 12; and a pilot trade experience programme for people to try out trades – Victoria govt. funded project . Methodologies for these studies are evaluated. Issues included significance of these evaluations, institutional climate, change and politics, the evaluation approaches and methods, outcomes and utility of the evaluators and the effective planning of the evaluations themselves – shared objectives between evaluators and organisations.
Learning include: Evaluations need to be
strategic and significant; evaluators must immerse themselves in the prevailing
climate and culture not only to understand what is going on, but also to take
what actions are possible to ensure the evaluation gathers the best possible
information; and evaluators must spend the time to get ‘buy-in’ from key
individuals and groups – at wide levels to unlock more and better sources of
information; evaluators must validate the information gathered carefully using
multiple sources to ensure veracity. Need to be aware of the limits of the
evaluation methodologies and data sources used and what can reasonably be
concluded based on the quality of info. collected. Evaluators need to be
sensitive to organisational climate and climax. Evaluators need to work closely
with their client to ensure that forms of reporting and their timeliness are
fit for purpose. Effective institutional evaluation requires careful initial
planning, leading to credibility and ability to effect real change.
Therefore, there is a need to have skilled
and arms-length evaluative and research capability within VET providers.
Then Berwyn Clayton on ‘Keeping up with the
Joneses: updating professionals in knowledge leading organisations’.
Berwyn’s presentation reports on a project
examining industry views on the management and maintenance of industry currency
on VET practitioners. Study included fields of science, health, engineering,
and human resources. Not only need to establish importance of currency but to
establish structures to support – including organisational strategies,
collaborative undertakings, monitoring and review. Follow up on a NCVTR project on knowledge and professional obsolescence.The presented project focused on what ways organisations may manage professional obsolescence and what can approaches to these problems drawn from industry and the professions be applied strategically in VET organisations? Approaches to updating professional practice include learning in and through work; collaborative learning; networking; problem-based and project-driven learning; shadowing, peer review and programmed knowledge exchange - eg. weekly seminars to share learning.
Lunch follows with opportunity to catch up with familiar faces and meet up with new researchers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)