Micro-credentials - advantages and disadvantages

Read Wendy Cato's linked in post (written within the Australian context I think) this morning and it triggered a reflection on the status and use of micro-credentials.

In NZ, micro-credentials were piloted a couple of years ago. They are now 'mainstream' and the general rule is that they should be 'stakable' rather than strictly standalone. 

Overseas, recent articles support the provision of micro-credentials. For example bbc posted an article on whether micro-credentials could compete with traditional degrees. And todayonline had an article on google courses which promise a shortcut into high paying jobs and what this means for skills training. 

Examples on youtube and individuals' post indicate self-directed learners are able to leverage of microcredentials - possibly in the ICT discipline.

So there is a place for micro-credentials but they really need to be led by individual's learning needs, rather than be imposed. Going down the micro-credentials route may be productive in the short term. However, by the nature of their small size and deep specialisation, microcredentials have limited reach. They are good for just-in-time, keep up with tech/latest processes type learning outcomes. Used as a supplement to broader education, micro-credentials have a distinct niche.

However, saying micro-credentials will replace degrees may be too far reaching. A good general education is still something all should aspire to. The world needs broad and critical thinkers, to help deal with the large challenges posed by climate change, globalisation and the ongoing pandemic. Micro-credentials allow for quick and deep specialisation, required to solve wicked problems. However, the ability to look beyond the narrow confines of ones specialisation are key to creativity and innovation along with the many skills, knowledge an dispositions to understand and work collaborative with others - who may think very differently from ourselves.

So as with everything,there are pluses and minuses to micro-credentials. The important aspect is to ensure the completion of small components of learning, helps people achieve work outcomes. However, to also remember, that qualifications of any sort, must not lead to 'dead ends' given the speed at which the future of work is evolving.

Microcredentials - slideshare from Professor Michael Brown (Eire/Ireland)

Here is a slideshare from Professor Mike Brown's presentation on microcredentials picked up this morning via LinkedIn.

Although the information has a country slant (in this case Ireland) the information is relevant and easily contextualised to other national systems.

Slides 14 and 15 show a quadrant of the types of ways microcredentials may be useful. The axis are whether the credentials are credit bearing or not and whether they are 'bundled' or 'unbundled' which I take to be whether the credentials are part of a larger qualification or stand alone. Associated with microcredentials, is the notion of badging. The EU seems to be exploring this concept in a bid to provide badging with recognition and also to bring them into regulatory control.

To be relevant, both bundled and unbundled are options depending on individual learners/organisational/national needs. Whether bundled or not, stacking is still the prevalent approach of qualification systems to addressing the recognition of microcredentials.

The NZ Qualifications Authority recognises microcredentials. The details are found on this site. The register of microcredentials in NZ  show a collection registered by Otago Polytechnic, a private provider and a few Industry Training Organisations (ITOs). 

So some activity in this area as addition of microcredentials into the qualifications ecosystem is one way to be more agile in meeting future of work and fast changing industry needs. The challenge is to avoid a plethora of microcredentials whilst balancing the need to be flexible! 

Microlearning

Checked my sitemeter last week & noticed Martin Lindner via the Oxford forum on mobile learning and technologies had dipped into this blog. I followed the links to his blog & then on to the microlearning conference website. The website contains links to the conference proceedings from 2006 and 2007. I have not had time to trawl through all the various presentations and reports but the concept of microlearning fits well into a mobile learning environment.

Microlearning refers to small learning units that are delivered for short learning spurts. They deliver ‘micro-perspectives’ within learning, education and training and provide a way for organising learning material in order for the material to be disseminated in a structured and planned learning sequence. For the moment, microlearning provides for a natural fit with the way in which content may be delivered via mobile devices.

However, the way in which mobile phones and other portable computing devises is developing does not mean that microlearning will always be the way things are done. A history of mobile phones ends with a look at the things that may be available on mobile phones in the future. In some senses, mobile phones seem to be developing technology that tries to replace what we now do on our desk tops. Whether mobile phones will eventually replace desk tops is yet to be seen but small UMPCs like the Asus eee show that the possibilities are there. Whether the majority of uses will engage with small screens and tiny keyboards for all of their computing needs remains to be investigated. But the possibilities are exciting and concepts like microlearning help educators adopt a more flexible mindset towards the delivery of ubiquitous access to learning resources.