OPSITAra - Day One

 At the local research forum ) OPSITAra, held this year at Invercargill and hosted by Southern Institute of Technology (SIT). The forum is an opportunity for researchers from Otago Polytechnic, Ara Institute of Canterbury and SIT to share research findings and to network across the three institutes. As we are all now Te Pūkenga, we also have participation from researchers across Aotearoa with researchers travelling from the North Island and the North of the South Island to also present.

The conference opens with Mihi Whakatau (welcome) hosted by Reniera Dallas, Daryl Haggerty, and Drs. Sally Bodkin Allen and James Savage. Dr. Megan Potiki, Executive Director Te Pūkenga Rohe 4 (which includes OP, SIT and Ara) provided an overview of her story and the mission required going forward to work with iwi. 

There is then a series of research Community of Practice (CoPs). Each meeting to discuss the possibilities for collegial and cooperative work and to network across the three institutions in the rohe.

After lunch, I attend the session with presentations on Teaching and Learning. There are two other streams (one pre-recorded) with presentations of research on construction/infrastructure and health well-being.

First up in the teaching and learning sessions, Dr. William Jenkins from UCOL talks about 'the impact of 2 COVID-19 lockdowns on NZ tertiary education students studying at a regional polytechnic. Reviewed the pandemic and the NZ response. Shared some NZ-based studies on the topic. Mixed responses from studies conducted at NZ universities and 2 ITP-context studies. In general, lock-down was stressful but all studies small and difficult to generalise. His study looked at the effects of the 2nd lockdown compared to the first. What was the difference between those who were more stressed and those less so. Survey at the end of 2021 with 68 analysed. In general students handled the second lockdown better. Divided data into 3 groups, 1/3 negative experiences, 1/3 neutral and 1/3 positive. In general, does with family had a more positive experience. 

He is followed on by Rachel van Gorp from Otago Polytechnic presenting on 'lecturing for neurodiversity: a guide to inclusive teaching'. Presented on the findings from her Master in Professional Practice where she interviewed 13 students and used these data to form practice recommendations. Neurodivergent brain functions differently. Challenges include difficulties understanding a following instructions, staying focused maintaining social interactions and high sensory overload. Important to build relationship with learners and make visible teachers' awareness and understanding of neurodiversity. Teaching methods need to be flexible and adaptable - use simple language and avoid jargon, check colours on visual resources, remember it is the first time learner is coming across the topic (even if you have taught it many times). Be aware of the need for breaks. Use support and resources. Ensure environment is inclusive. Connection between teacher and learner is critical. Teacher need to have access to resources and know how to use them. Be neurodiverse centred. Keep current with evidence-based practice on the topic. Draw on institutional support. For teachers, give learners extra time, provide visual aids, break complex tasks down, over one on one tutor support. 

Helen Mataiti and Amy Benian with Rach MacNamara from Otago Polytechnic are next on 'learning for all: designing learning in our work-based context'. Introduced the principles of Universal Design of Learning (UDL). Began with the socio-cultural history of the UDL framework and how it can be translated into our Aotearoa NZ tertiary and vocational education context. UDL backed up by neuroscience research to ensure there is good design of representation (recognition networks, - visual, aural etc. what we learn), action and expression (strategic networks - how we learn) and engagement (affective networks - why we learn). Used a qualitative, storying and empowerment method to find out how UDL help to reduce barriers to learning and that it is not a reinvention of 'learning styles'. Provided examples as to how to apply the UDL principles. 

The last session in this collection is with Rachel Byars with Greta Bauer, also from OP who presents on 'creating a sense of community and wellbeing through events'. Outlined the project carried out by Greta with the OP Student Association. OPSA events were impacted by Covid. The aim was to find out how students felt about student events and their impact on wellbeing. Summarised importance of these events, wellbeing and how each intersects with the other (lit. review). Survey of all students and then interviews with 6 event organisers and students as target groups. In general, survey revealed the importance of events to socialise with friends, entertainment, take a break, improve wellbeing, gain knowledge and for individual and community rewards. Overall, events are important to students, helping to build a sense of belonging, community and wellbeing. Important to create an events representative on the OPSA executive committee,  increased coordination within OP schools and survey each year to gauge student perpectives on events.

I attend the Research CoP on the Scholarship of teaching and learning, convened by Sonja Swale (SIT) and Claire Goode (OP). 

Short 'lightning talks' then occur across teaching and learning, construction, and health and well-being themes. 7 presentations, each 7 minutes long! Topics covered include 'reimaging Bourdieu'; assessment practice, psychological safety, personal experiences on teaching practice; how to communicate the unknown. and big ideas with students. Presenters from SIT, OP, Nelson-Marlborough Polytechnic - Selena Coburn, Fiona McLaren, Mark Wilson, Andrea Jones, Wendy Olsen, Maria Grace and Tim Lynch. 

The evening ends with a networking event, allowing everyone to few posters and creative exhibits. There are also several presentations from researchers in the creative industries.

ASCILITE - Bringing Australasian Technology and Practice Trends into Focus - 2022-2023 Contextualising Horizon report

 ASCILITE publication - provides a contemporary reporting of the digital technology and practices across Australasia. 

Porter, D. B., Campbell, C., Logan-Fleming, D., & Jones, H. (Eds.). (2023). Bringing Australasian Technology and Practice Trends Into Focus: The 2022–2023 Contextualising Horizon Report. ASCILITE. 

The practices are thematic organised into: hybrid and flexible learning; AI literacy; mental health and well-being; the evolution of mobile learning; and integration of indigenous knowledges.

STEEP (social, technological, economic, environmental and political) trends affecting how technology is availed and practices resources and supported, are discussed.

Social trends, post-pandemic, mean there are new ways of working, both within industry and academia. However, the pandemic also revealed the many challenges of digital equity and inclusivity, which have not been solved. The main technological influence presently, is Gen AI which requires workforce capability to be built. Advances in augmented and virtual reality, also require capability to be resources. The current rise in the cost of living, the reshaping of the higher education workforce, and a move towards skills-based hiring, all affect economics. Environmental concerns include the design of physical spaces to provide for more flexible work, learning and teaching, initiatives to support diversity, equity and inclusion, and the need to maintain and meet future sustainable development goals, are all important. Political forces include current and possible/impending global disruption, changes in government funding models, and the inclusion  of first people's.

Of note in the exemplars for the hybrid/flexible learning theme is the Ara midwifery programme's networked-distributed model.

All in, a good update on where the sector is at with digital technology approaches towards tertiary education. 

ASCILITE - transforming assessment site

This year's ASCILITE (Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education) conference is being held in Christchurch in early December. Some of my colleagues will attend.

ASCILITE itself maintains good resources to informvarious pedagogical and technology enhanced learning endeavours. 

Of note is their site on assessments  on 'transforming assessments'., which also archives webinars on the topic and has a collation of past events as well. 

Of interest, is one on 'guiding the use of Gen AI for assessment' head in September. 

Agency by Design - Derek Wenmouth

 This book -  Agency by Design: An Educator's Playbook -by Derek Wenmouth with Marsha Jones, George Edwards and Annette Thompson, provides strategies to help provide learners with the skills to be self-directed learners. The book is free to download.

The book is pitched at the school context but many of the ideas and resources, are relevant across all education sectors. The book begins with a 'how to use the playbook' section, including an overview of the framework proposed to help activate agency in learners.

Then it moves to the implementation section which has 7 suggested conditions that can be created by teachers to increase learner agency and the characteristics (rubrics) observed in students which signal their learners' agency.

In a world of rapid and continual change, schools need to prepare their students, for a VUCA world. Learning the fundamentals are important (i.e. reading, writing and arithmetic). Beyond that, the real role of education, is to provide students with the confidence in their own abilities and to encourage and support the attitudinal qualities -resilience/ grit, curiosity, multimodal communication, flexibility and agility in learning and continual learning etc.

In all, a good summary, with practical examples for teachers, of not only encouraging, but building self-efficacy, leadership and continual adaptability in learners. 

AI in education - two sides to the coin

 There is a large corpus of literature on AI and its contributions or its deleterious effects on education. Most report on the school or higher education context. The number of articles commenting on AI in education has increased markedly across 2023, much of which  being the reactions towards the advent of Gen AI. 

The article by Hamilton, William and Hattie (2023)  -the future of AI in education: 13 things we can do to minimise the damage - paints a dystopian picture, positing that school education especially, needs to do a major rethink as to its purposes and roles given the ways AI could replace the need for human thinking. There is also the need to evaluate how AI/human synthesis will work, and what needs to be done to prepare the children today, for the future where synergistic relationships between non-human and human intelligences, are the norm.

This op ed by Oxford University Press - AI in education, where we are and what happens next - takes on a more pragmatic view. Firstly doing an overview of where things are now with regards to the global picture, Ai's impact on teachers, possible impacts on learning, the challenges of the digital divide and AI, and  outlines recommendations for going forward. These include: supporting, not substituting teachers, seeking the highest quality resources to back AI, empowering teachers to use technology in the classroom, equipping students with the skills to be able to complement the affordances of AI, with a priority on ensuring there is good understanding of how AI can or cannot contribute to learning. A pragmatic viewpoint.

Therefore, going forward, there is a need to ensure Gen AI literacy becomes part of academic / digital literacies. Only then can educators and learners understand and use AI rather than have AI foisted on us by the powerful corporations developing the tools/apps that make Gen AI accessible. 

Neurodiversity - chunking is a simple hack: great for academic skill acquisition - with Dora Roimata Lngsbury - Ara / Te Pūkenga

 Notes from a lunchtime session with Dora Roimata Langsbury, Kaiako Ako - academic learning support. She presented this paper at the recent Neuroability symposium conference in Dunedin. 

Focused on supporting written assessments in this iteration of her presentation. Began by sharing her background - where she was diagnosed with dyslexia when she first started at Teachers College to train as a primary school teacher. Introduced the 8 steps for writing an assessment and then went through each one with strategies at each to support neurodiversity.

Summarised some of the concepts from the book 'Studying with Dyslexia' by Janet Goodwin - 2012. Then shared student perspectives to support these concepts.

Then went through the importance of time management for all students. Need to be clear so students create a doable timetable that includes sufficient study time. Working backwards from assessment targets is also helpful.

Ensure students understand the question, Sometimes learners need help to deconstruct the instructions and to understand the connections between the assessment and the marking rubric. All a lot of text and helping learners break down the larger task into smaller chunks helps learners focus and not be overwhelmed.

Then help students create a writing plan. Help them keep one main idea per paragraph with the structure of topic sentence, supporting ideas, example and then a linking sentence to the next paragraph. 

The next step is to help them bring about a research plan to help them gather the literature and select which parts are relevant.

Then introduced the need to help students attain notetaking/ paraphrasing skills. Students need to understand the role of each sentence, use words from questions to create sentence starters and use keywords from sources to complete the first draft of sentences. This helps build paragraphs and the whole assignment, one sentence at a time.

Reference/cite as you go or APA as you go by using an APA reference guide. There is a need to scaffold learners towards understanding how to use the guide as a way to ensure APA referencing is accurate.

Editing can be undertaken in 3 steps - sentence level, paragraph level and then proofreading and formatting. At sentence level, separate each with white space so that it is easier to 'switch and trim'. Paragraph editing is to check flow and linking and to map these to the marking guide. The proof 'clean' read makes easier to see the small errors. 

Shared the impact on students of using the above framework and also how the 'tuakana teina' or 'older brother/sister with younger brother/sister' peer learning which is framed with attaining the 8 steps have improved engagement, learning and outcomes for learners. 

Q & A followed from an interested audience.