Tertiary Education Union (TEU) AI conference

 The TEU- Te Hautu Kahurangi -  convened a conference on AI, with panels discussing a range of topics related to AI, Union support, and teaching and learning. Due to other work commitments, I am only able to attend two of the sessions and be part of the panel on Mana Mātauranga (power of knowledge). 

There are sessions on Mana mahi - keeping decent work at the centre as AI reshapes tertiary education; Mana Taurite - exploring how AI can support equity and inclusion across tertiary education and Mana Taiao - ensuring AI in tertiary education aligns with climate action and environmental justice.

Notes taken from the sessions I was able to get to are below:

Seesion on Mana mahi - keeping decent work at the centre as AI reshapes tertiary education.

Dr Hansi Gunasinghe (Southern Institute of Technology). - Ai transforming education from administration to research. How can we balance innovation with dignity of work? Need to discuss the understanding of Gen AI and the human role. Went through principles of Gen AI - what it is, main types, applications. Shared the examples, opportunities and risks with Gen AI. AI can support teaching - tools help create lesson plans, quizzes, tutorials, and accessibility resources. Automation should support educators, not replace them. Shared research underway with students in China studying how to design a mobile application prototype using FIGMA. AI was used to create marking criteria with human evaluation from tutors. Automated evaluation undertaken using ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot and compare these with human evaluations. Conclusions will derive time used, accuracy and the process. the next step is to integrate FIGMA prototype extraction tool and video creation. Ai is fast, scaloble, data drive. Humans are empathetic, ethical and contextual. A balance defines the dignity of work. Ran through current institutional policies on AI use for students, the policies for staff are still under development. Therefore, AI must be a support not as a 'supervisor'; ensure human oversight and co-design with educators and learners. Adopt transparent, open and ethical systems. Dignity in work means that humans lead. This needs to preserve profesisonal judgement and relational teaching. include Ai literacy and conultation in policy. Respect Te Ao Māori principles and protect workload fairness and AI should strengthen, not weaken, our human values. 

Dr. Leon Salter (University of Auckland) - AI working group at UoA - summarised UoA approach, with his personal viewpoints. VC's forum and new action plan shows the university to be techno - optimistic. The action plan was prepared by ' the AI education advisory group' which did not consult with staff, unions and chaired by the Director of Learning and Teaching. The document mentions risks and guiding principles at the start but never mentioned again in the rest of the 10 pages! In general, to exhort staff to integrate AI into teaching and learning. Offers 'carrots' to encourage AI integration with underlying disparaging of reluctant staff as 'dino-professors'. A AI working group formed which is open to all TEU members to  provide critical feedback on the university's direction and be a support group. Summarised work of Dan McQuillan on 'resisting AI - an anti-fascist approach to AI'. Shared the findings from a TEU survey of university staff to find out about their perspectives on university policy and communications on AI and usage of AI in workplace. Overall sentiment of discontent - generally dissatisfaction with leaderships communication and policy. Open to sharing perspectives from others running similar groups, and keen to connect. 

Session on Mana Tiriti.- navigating the relationship between AI, Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and the future of tertiary education

On the panel are Brendon Shaw from Papatoeotoe North School, Dr. Kevin Shedlock from Victoria University Wellington, Olivier Jutel (University of Otago) and Warwick Tie (Massey University).

Brendon presented on 'He whānaungatanga Tīmatanga: AI and Te Tiriti o Waitangi in our schools'. He teaches at a primary school but is also a PhD studenta at University of Waikato. Went through the ways principles of Te Tiriti are enacted in schools with respect to AI. With Partnerships - Māori need to be involved in the co-design of the AI lifecycle from data to deployment. True partnership means Māori are present in the creation of AI systems, not just assessing outputs. Māori-led initiatives like Te Hiku Media exemplify bicultural AI governance. Participation means removing the barriers to access the technology. Work needs to be undertaken on the digital divide and equitable solutions. The CoVID pandemic showed how Māori are on the wrong side of both the digital divide and equity and these need to be addressed. Protection includes being cognisant of safe guarding Taonga and identity, as expects of data sovereignty need to be culturally relevant. Data still biased and created images based on these.

Kevin's topic was 'navigating the relationship between AI, Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and the future of tertiary education. Covered Te Tiriti when creating digital AI artifacts; indigenous Māori knowledge that resides in these; and the digital artifact. Ai in tertiary education can be envisaged as being a conduit where both indigenous and western research paradigms are able to reside in search of new knowledge within the Tiriti. This is challenge as there are not enough people on the ground to support the indigenous side. Challenges also include digital inequalities, unequal access to heritage, power imbalances in defining narratives, data ownership and digital ethics, lack of adequate infrastructure and environment pressures and sustainable issues. So what is good vs bad Māori data?? Difficult questions requiring deep understanding and immersion, not just to tick the box. Indigenous Māori knowledge in artifacts needs to go beyond the surface. There are no protocols for where Māori knowledge resides and therefore its expression in data is different, its needs to have the correct framing, be build on relationships and thrive through engagement, not as a piece of digital artifact. Check with work of Shedlock,R. and Hudson, P (2022) - use of Mātauranga clearly organised Advocates for reciprocal and respectful AI. Requires good understanding of the problem; trusted relationships and mutual agreement to reach consent. 

Oliver  - we are not able to build Mātuaranga Māori onto the existing western techno-centric AI model. Spoke on 'AGI and the PE of AI'. Ran briefly through the ideological history of AI - George Boole, Marvin Minsky and ELIZA as the foundation of the western technocratic understanding and roots of AI. Shifted to the current day, with perspectives on AI from Musk, Altman. Book by David Noble 'The religion of Technology recommended. Connects religion and AI marketing. Detailed how AI is overblown with not much making sense with regard to AI possibilities for making money. AI must not be thought of in 'god-like' terms but challenged to make contributions to the wider society. 

Session on Mana Mātauranga - harnessing AI to strengthen teaching, learning and research, and uphold public tertiary education.

With me on this panel are Dr. Shahper Richter (University of Auckland), Dr. Warwick Tie (Massey University) and Traci Meek-Reid (Southern Institute of Technology) who facilitates the session.

I begin the session with an overview of the AI@Ara projects. Summarising their overall objectives, pedagogical underpinnings and implications on the work of tertiary educators. Details of these the two main projects are now published in the book - AI in vocational education and training; and the Ako Aotearoa report on 'AI to support foundation/bridging learners'. It is important to undertake good learning design so that AI does not replace the 'learning activities' required for learning and teachers role is well defined. 

Warwick presents on "upping our game" - shared the themes from his course on AI. AI's relation to language through speech acts, discursive formations and the discursive. Ai in the discursive can be envisaged as AI as the 'public unconscious' and suffers no anxiety! AI does not use language, but redefines how we understand, teach and use it. Ai is a player in the linguistic landscape. In his course, how can we do more with words (upping our game).  Therefore to view AI as static (postivism); AI in movement (dialectics); Ai as a discursive construct (discourse analysis). Showed matrix on how each of these affected by AI across various social categories. Discussed the assignment - asked students to use the Gen AI to write a 1000 word essay on what needs to be asked and then analyse what the bot has provided (1500 words). Is the AI approaching from the positivist, dialectical or discursive approach?? AI agents can only deal with what it can see, but not it cannot. It can discuss the doughnut but not the hole in the middle :) 

Shahper continues with discussion on Warwick's assessment approach. The session moves into a discussion on AI in teaching and learning and the various ways assessments can be shifted to include AI or be used to learn the limitations of AI. The conversation moved to what AI to use and when it can be used. Assessment standards are not much higher as the assumption will be that students have access to AI and will use them. Digital equity discussed as the challenges are different across the sectors. 

Dr Julie Douglas TEU Te Tumu Whakarae (National Co-President - Tiriti) facilitates the last session for each of the facilitators through the day, summarises the sessions they have chaired. 

All in, good discussion, with many perspectives from across education sectors, on the opportunities, challenges, implications and promises of AI in education. The advantage of the discussions is the focus on being critical educators, leading the integration of AI into education. We must actively contribute to the policies and conversations around AI, providing a voice for educators and learners. 

The conference closed with the reading of the TEU karakia.

Education reform in NZ - continued - University sector views

Another flurry of activity through the media as the various NZ tertiary sectors submit views to the new Minister of Education's mandate to reform the NZ education system.

Following on from posts over the last couples of weeks on vocational education and the school qualifications, there is now perspectives from the university sector. These are recorded from the Tertiary Education Union (TEU) convening of a workshop from the NZ university sector with submissions also from unions and students. The Ministers perspectives are found here and the summary of the recommendations arising from the workshop are reported here.

All the above signals the Labour Government's intention to move away from the decades of emphasis on market-let economics - the neo-liberal agenda. In NZ, a good overview with regards to neo-liberalism's effect on education is the book - Children of Rogernomics - a neo-liberal generation leaves school. Aspects of the perspectives collected in this book are also reflected in this survey on 18-24 year olds - worried about the prospects of the digital future on work. In particular, on the precarious world of work with poor prospects for tenure, intensive demands to continually retrain / re-skill / re-invent oneself and the dated career advise the currently receive.

Discussion on the effects of neo-liberalism on education is not new. See this 2006 book mostly on the American context. The world-wide push back on the negative effects wrought by neo-liberalism is a decade old. It has taken time for people to understand what the effects are and research and explore alternatives. In NZ, under an MMP (mixed member proportional) electoral system, the current Labour Party came into government at the end of last year, due to the decision made by 'king maker'. The decision was based on his feeling of the electorate seeking a change towards a more balanced social system.

 Therefore, now important to explore what other governments have been doing with their education systems. Especially ones which encourage collaboration across the sector instead of a competitive market-driven ethos. Interesting times ahead for all NZ educators which is perceived by those at the chalk-face to be under-funded, with teacher shortages in the compulsory school sector and a need to shift curriculum and pedagogy to reflect the needs of the future.

Tertiary Education Symposium - presentations archived

The local union for Tertiary Teachers held a symposium on 22nd July. Short videos of some of the presentations and discussions, including one on a return to the concept of lifelong learning, are now available.

Impetus for the symposium would be the current discussions within NZ and internationally on the future of work and education. In NZ, the government has begun work through the productivity commission to work out some scenarios. The TEU submission makes for good reading along with the submission from the metro /NZITP (institutes of technology and polytechnics.

Above follows on from several initiatives in NZ to plan ahead for the fourth industrial revolution. For example, the opposition Labour Party's proposal for Universal Basic Income along with discussions on alternatives. Staying still and not doing anything is no longer an option :(

For education, MOOCs have been one option which have slightly lost it's gloss - see from tsunami to ripple. Personalised education is a possibility, with various options for platforms and support from big names in computing - e.g. Zuckerberg. However, the first initiatives will cater for the compulsory school sector and the more generic type courses in higher education. Vocational education will always be last in the queue due to it's inherent diversity, complexity and need for situated learning experiences.

Therefore, important to keep up with the play and keep an eye out for the emergent technology which will be fit for purpose for the vocational education sector.