Microcredentialling is one of the ‘buzz’ items now rapidly
becoming a ‘must have’ within formal institutions’ portfolio. In NZ, there have
been growing interest in, see this and this, and the NZ qualifications
Authority (NZQA) is undertaking a series of pilots – edubits – to work out how
micro-credentials could be implemented.
However, there are many interpretations of what actually are
micro-credentials, see here for one.
In general, microcredentials belong within established suites of qualification options. They may be useful in the following segments of learner journeys:
As a precursor to entry into a programme, or shift to slightly re-configured
job etc.
Within a formalised programme of learning to enable greater
flexibility – i.e. through ‘stacking’, RPL or recognition of ‘soft skills’ etc.
For continual professional development – e.g. programmers
up-skilling to new programming language.
An established case study distilled
some principles for development and implementation of micro-credentials within
a teacher professional development programme.
Within the NZ context, Mischewski from E2E completed a report for the Tertiary Education Commision to find out how micro-credentials can be used to improve
engineering as an educational option, in particular at diploma level. Figure 5 – page 23 provides an example in engineering – for how microcredentailling may be useful for beginning,
developing, upskilling and expert engineers and the types of learning including
micro, work-based and formal that can be credentialed. The report also summarises pros and cons within the NZ engineering industry and education contexts.
1 comment:
Micro-credentialing is such a timely and promising shift, especially in New Zealand’s evolving education landscape. I love how it bridges gaps—whether it's entry into programs, career shifts, or upskilling for professionals. The engineering example really brings it to life. Looking forward to seeing how NZQA’s pilots shape the future of flexible, targeted learning! diploma
Post a Comment