Microcredentialling is one of the ‘buzz’ items now rapidly
becoming a ‘must have’ within formal institutions’ portfolio. In NZ, there have
been growing interest in, see this and this, and the NZ qualifications
Authority (NZQA) is undertaking a series of pilots – edubits – to work out how
micro-credentials could be implemented.
However, there are many interpretations of what actually are
micro-credentials, see here for one.
In general, microcredentials belong within established suites of qualification options. They may be useful in the following segments of learner journeys:
As a precursor to entry into a programme, or shift to slightly re-configured
job etc.
Within a formalised programme of learning to enable greater
flexibility – i.e. through ‘stacking’, RPL or recognition of ‘soft skills’ etc.
For continual professional development – e.g. programmers
up-skilling to new programming language.
An established case study distilled
some principles for development and implementation of micro-credentials within
a teacher professional development programme.
Within the NZ context, Mischewski from E2E completed a report for the Tertiary Education Commision to find out how micro-credentials can be used to improve
engineering as an educational option, in particular at diploma level. Figure 5 – page 23 provides an example in engineering – for how microcredentailling may be useful for beginning,
developing, upskilling and expert engineers and the types of learning including
micro, work-based and formal that can be credentialed. The report also summarises pros and cons within the NZ engineering industry and education contexts.
No comments:
Post a Comment