The presentations from the recent NZ Vocational Education and Training (VET) research forum are now available online from Ako Aotearoa and the ITF websites.
I have updated the summaries from day 1 and day 2 blogs incorporating links to the presentations. Here are links to presentations I was not able to attend but are of interest to my projects.
- 'use of explanations and analogies in teaching physics concepts relevant to the trades' with Dr. James MacKay from Weltec.
- 'enabling self-regulated learning environments in a Masters programme: the development of an online training needs analysis tool' by Dr. John Clayton from Wintec.
- 'Many roads lead to Rome: trends in methodology and method in research into cooperative work-integrated education' with Katharine Hoskyn from AUT.
Also, a compilation of various Ako Aotearoa national and hub funded projects was launched at the networking event on day 1 of the forum. The publication ' learning in and for work' presents summaries through thematic collation around key findings (learning about the workplace, learning what to do and how to do it and learning to identify 'as') and the highlights from on-job learning, placements , practicums and work-integrated learning, assessments, mentoring and peer support and tables correlating the various features supporting workplace learning with each of the selected projects. The publication forms a corpus of work funded by Ako Aotearoa, now regularly cited amongst NZ researchers and contributing to better support for workplace based learners via ITO and government policy developments.
Learning about elearning, m-learning, eportfolios, AI in VET, learning design and curriculum development. Also wanders across into research, including VET systems, workplace learning, apprenticeships, trades tutors and vocational identity formation. Plus meanderings into philosophy and neuroscience as I learn about how we learn. Usual disclaimers apply. This blog records my personal learning journey, experiences and thoughts and may not always be similar to the opinions of my employer.
Monday, November 03, 2014
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
Discourses on Professional Learning: On the boundary of learning and work - chapter summaries
Discourses on Professional Learning: On the
boundary between learning and working.
Edited by C. Harteis, A. Rausch and J.
Seifried (2014) and published by Springer. Hardcopy in CPIT library.
The book has introductory and concluding
chapters, 15 chapters collected into 3 parts. Below, summaries of chapters
relevant to my current work and research.
Introduction by the editors
Part 1 – Analytical perspectives – learning
in work context - has 6 chapters.
Chapter 2 – Agentic behaviour at work:
crafting learning experiences by M. Goller and S. Billett. This chapter
provides a rare critique to the ‘deliberate practice’ concept. Work is held to
be complex, contextualised to individual workplaces, open to distinct
socio-cultural and socio-material challenges and reliant on individual’s
intrinsic motivation. Precepts of deliberate practice have been derived from
studies of expertise founded in narrowly prescribed fields (i.e playing chess,
sports, music) comprising small number of well-defined activities. Whereas all
work is undertaken in difficult to define environments, structured to allow for
organisational objectives (i.e. same occupation but different focuses – e.g.
chef in hospital, cafĂ©, fine-dining restaurant, fast foot etc.). Individual’s
agency is held to be significant in how workplace learning progresses.
Chapter 5 with S. Billett on the topic
‘mediating learning at work: personal mediations of social and brute factors. As
with chapter 2, the emphasis is on individuals being agentic in their
approaches to workplace learning. Important to focus on socio-cultural and
socio-material (the inter-psychological processes) but and how individuals
learning (the intra-psychological processes). However, it is the ways in which
inter and intra psychological processes inter-relate that are important. In
particular, how individuals deploy intra-psychological processes to deal with
the world around them.
Chapter 6 on ‘error climate and how
individuals deal with errors in the workplace’ by A. Baumgartner and J.
Seifried. An interesting study with apprentices in the hotel and restaurant
industry. The importance of ‘error climate’ is introduced to explain how in
some circumstances, learning through making mistakes can be useful contributors
to workplace learning, and how in other workplaces, making mistakes is
unsupported and thus seen to be impediments to progress. So, the workplace and
worker attitudes to error are contributing factors.
Chapter 7 by T. Schley and M van Woerkom on
‘reflection and reflective behaviour in work teams’. Extends on understandings
about the role of reflection in learning. Much based on intra-psychological /
individual as reflector model. However, just as important to view reflection
and reflective approaches in team-based work teams. Little research on how
teams contribute to organisational improvement through work team reflection so
proposes need to carry out more detailed studies.
Part 2 covers – analytical perspectives –
work as learning environment – has 6 chapters
Chapter 9 contributed by M. Tyler, S. Choy,
R. Smith and D. Dymock discusses ‘learning in response to workplace change’.
Based on large study based in 4 occupations. Found workers tended to
concentrate on work tasks changes rather than on organisational strategic
directions. Workers tended to concentrate on maintaining their immediate
employability skills. Therefore, workplace change needs to be focused on
helping workers gain skills they perceive as contributing to their professional
development to complete their current jobs well.
Chapter 12 – ‘developing medical capacities
and dispositions through practice-based experiences’ with J. Cleland, J. Leaman
and S. Billett. Goals and objectives of workplace learning for new medical
staff identified as – identification / confirmation of individual’s fit within
the medical specialities; learning skills to perform as medical staff; and
continue to develop as medical staff through their occupational lives.
Chapter 13 – ‘ ePortfolio: A practical tool
for self-directed, reflective and collaborative professional learning’ by A. L. Daunert & L. Price provides a
guide to the different ways eportfolios may be used in professional learning
and development contexts. Introduces the concept of eportfolio and undertakes a
review of reported advantages /positive impacts
and the reverse on challenges of eportfolios. Also provides guidelines
on linking eportfolios to professional development plans based on adapted ADDIE
(analyse, design, develop, implement, evaluate).
Part 3 covers methodological issues
Chapter 15 on ‘social network analyses
(SNA) of learning at workplaces’ by T. Palonen and K. Hakkarainen. Provides
rationale for and introduces the precepts of social network analysis as a way
to study ‘socially distributed expertise’. SNA is used to find out how
individuals, their groups / sub-groups relate to each other. How people
interrelate to each other is a focus in organisational management studies using
SNA. SNA also useful in other fields for studying spread of disease, diffusion
of information, animal social organisations etc. Future potentials and
limitations of SNA are discussed.
Chapter 16 with L. Filliettaz on ‘learning
through interactional participatory configuration: contributions from video
analysis'. Introduces the frameworks and rationale for using video analysis of
workplace practice. Two items discussed in the article – video useful in
exploring and making sense of interpersonal relationships in learning /
workplace situations; and promoting video as a viable method for research
studies into professional practice.
Chapter 17 by A. Rausch on ‘using diaries
in research on work and learning’. Rationale for using diaries to record
workplace learning presented and discussed. The various ways to deploy
diary-based studies (diaries as research instruments) can be deployed are also
presented – work task diaries, social interaction diaries, problem diaries, and
interruption diaries. A comprehensive chapter on with how to, why, when etc.
for the use of diarie.
Conclusion drawn by S. Billett with
discussion on ‘interdependence on the boundaries between working and learning’.
Tuesday, October 21, 2014
NZ VET forum - day 2
Day 2 opens with a keynote from Dr. Neil Haigh from AUT on 'collaboration and project team: understanding and creating success'. Brought up the issue of room layout as one of the factors impinging on how teams collaborate. Firstly, need to begin collaboration from the beginning, all parties working on proposal and understanding objectives (institutional, researcher, individual project focus etc.) from the outset. Relationships require building well before beginning so perspectives from each other are understood. Structured plan for the actual collaborative process need to be drawn up. Collaboration implies 'working together to create and achieve the same thing'. But what are differences between collaboration vs coordination and cooperation?? Perhaps collaboration implies deeper interactions which are durable and mutually advantageous. Resources to support the process provided.
After morning tea, short concurrent sessions begin. First up, Dr. Liz Gordon, Sandra Grey, Charles Sedgwick and Katarina Edmonds from Pukeko Research with 'is the youth guarantee fees-free scheme and effective pathway for former NEETS'. Reports on a recent large TEC funded project involving students in 30 training organisations to see is policy implementation has succeeded in moving youth not in employment, education or training (NEETs) into more productive situations. Examined the factors contributing to achievement in the fees free YG programmes. A real need to have interventions as unemployment 15-19 now up to 25% with some the children of youth unemployed in the mid 1990's! Principles in NZ are social not economic with regards to instituting free-fees at lower level courses. Level 2 NCEA seen as minimum requirement for work. Issues are to do with keeping NEETs engaged and viability of courses. Profile of YG students and courses presented. Some TEOs have to resort to 'cherry picking' by keeping on students who are able to achieve due to say funding is utilised. Burden on tutors with heavy pastoral care.
Second concurrent session with Jenny, Connnor from Service IQ, Dr. Nicky Murray from Career Force, Fiona Beardslee from Primary ITO and Matthew Vandy from Competenz presented on 'learning to learn for work: industry based foundation education'. Provided overview of how 4 ITOs have gone about supporting workplace based foundation learning at levels 1 and 2. These 4 ITOS have 85% of learners in foundation workplace based training. Each one has different learner profile. A model for foundation education in the workplace contrasted to the more school / post-school TEO delivered examples explained. Paper available on request.
The third session for the morning is with Malcolm Hardy from BoPP on 'from industry to institute: teacher in transition'. Shared his autobiography of working on site one day and then teaching at the polytechnic the next. Experiences of not enjoying school and how these meant he engaged students with project-based learning. Presented project on finding how to better help trades people become tutors. 20 tutors completing questions and interviews. Asked the questions - what was the biggest changes you had to make as a tradesperson as you transition into teaching? What support needed to make changes? what is the advice you would give to someone coming from industry to teaching? Advice to polytechnic? What keeps you going? In all, adjustment from trades to teaching needs time, support and provision of 'teaching tools', opportunities to observe other teachers. In particular, moving from teaching a few to a whole class and class management, working with your head/hands/emotions/heart not just hands as at trades work, dealing with educational jargon / organisational systems, how too motivate students, different ways of working, digital literacy requirements, learnt mainly from other staff, one on one mentor who cares - could be newbie as well. Align trade based tutors training to apprenticeship model.
After lunch longer concurrent sessions of 45 minutes. As I was presenting in the second session, I attended Angus Robertson's (Unitec) session with Sylila Monnteiro on 'assessment of prior learning: the recognition and endorsement of experiential learning'. Need for APL in carpentry due to licencing component to be a builder. APL finds a balance between the body of knowledge vs mastery of process and academic rigour vs capabilities of an occupation. A new type of structure required compared to normal institutional systems. APL evidence normally through journals and portfolios but a barrier for tradies with experience but poor literacy. Process to examine CV, interview, challenge test, design assessment to identify gaps in knowledge, observe, record evidence, seek validation from credible people, examine evidence collected by quality assessors and lastly examine student's compilation of evidence. Main challenge for assessor to ensure rigority and consistency. Recommendations to monitor assessors and moderate work, create guidelines for assessors, ensure students so have appropriate experience, when teaching, make evidence require overt. Current process has practical assessment (APL, portfolio etc.) and theory (fully online with 'branched'quizzes including revision content where required). Uses Google drive supported by Teacher Blackboard (NZ developed teaching platform).Assignments revolve around students completing powerpoint slides. Discussed advantages and disadvantages of the shift to blended / online platform. Presented future plans to improve.
Then my session on 'learning a trade' to share the literature, findings, recommendations and resources (poster and video) with participants. Feedback on the draft resources gathered to inform final version. Presentation here.
Last plenary / panel session on effective mentoring and peer support. With Anne Alkema on 'peer support for trainees in the health and community sector: building a sustainable learning model';
Sandra Johnson from Downer NZ on 'mentoring model for ITOs and employers'; and Dr. Lesley Petersen and Mike Styles and Marianne Farrell from the Primary ITO on 'evaluating a voluntary mentoring programme for trainees in the primary ITO. Each presented their experience / project and questions followed.
All in a varied programme with emphasis on support /pastoral care structures for learners in a range of learning contexts. Not as many people this year, an outcome of the continual restructures in the ITO sector, now mostly complete. As outcomes of TRoQ are worked through with new programmes of study, the VET sector is now perhaps now looking forward to a more settled few years, working through various challenges of assisting vocational learners.
After morning tea, short concurrent sessions begin. First up, Dr. Liz Gordon, Sandra Grey, Charles Sedgwick and Katarina Edmonds from Pukeko Research with 'is the youth guarantee fees-free scheme and effective pathway for former NEETS'. Reports on a recent large TEC funded project involving students in 30 training organisations to see is policy implementation has succeeded in moving youth not in employment, education or training (NEETs) into more productive situations. Examined the factors contributing to achievement in the fees free YG programmes. A real need to have interventions as unemployment 15-19 now up to 25% with some the children of youth unemployed in the mid 1990's! Principles in NZ are social not economic with regards to instituting free-fees at lower level courses. Level 2 NCEA seen as minimum requirement for work. Issues are to do with keeping NEETs engaged and viability of courses. Profile of YG students and courses presented. Some TEOs have to resort to 'cherry picking' by keeping on students who are able to achieve due to say funding is utilised. Burden on tutors with heavy pastoral care.
Second concurrent session with Jenny, Connnor from Service IQ, Dr. Nicky Murray from Career Force, Fiona Beardslee from Primary ITO and Matthew Vandy from Competenz presented on 'learning to learn for work: industry based foundation education'. Provided overview of how 4 ITOs have gone about supporting workplace based foundation learning at levels 1 and 2. These 4 ITOS have 85% of learners in foundation workplace based training. Each one has different learner profile. A model for foundation education in the workplace contrasted to the more school / post-school TEO delivered examples explained. Paper available on request.
The third session for the morning is with Malcolm Hardy from BoPP on 'from industry to institute: teacher in transition'. Shared his autobiography of working on site one day and then teaching at the polytechnic the next. Experiences of not enjoying school and how these meant he engaged students with project-based learning. Presented project on finding how to better help trades people become tutors. 20 tutors completing questions and interviews. Asked the questions - what was the biggest changes you had to make as a tradesperson as you transition into teaching? What support needed to make changes? what is the advice you would give to someone coming from industry to teaching? Advice to polytechnic? What keeps you going? In all, adjustment from trades to teaching needs time, support and provision of 'teaching tools', opportunities to observe other teachers. In particular, moving from teaching a few to a whole class and class management, working with your head/hands/emotions/heart not just hands as at trades work, dealing with educational jargon / organisational systems, how too motivate students, different ways of working, digital literacy requirements, learnt mainly from other staff, one on one mentor who cares - could be newbie as well. Align trade based tutors training to apprenticeship model.
After lunch longer concurrent sessions of 45 minutes. As I was presenting in the second session, I attended Angus Robertson's (Unitec) session with Sylila Monnteiro on 'assessment of prior learning: the recognition and endorsement of experiential learning'. Need for APL in carpentry due to licencing component to be a builder. APL finds a balance between the body of knowledge vs mastery of process and academic rigour vs capabilities of an occupation. A new type of structure required compared to normal institutional systems. APL evidence normally through journals and portfolios but a barrier for tradies with experience but poor literacy. Process to examine CV, interview, challenge test, design assessment to identify gaps in knowledge, observe, record evidence, seek validation from credible people, examine evidence collected by quality assessors and lastly examine student's compilation of evidence. Main challenge for assessor to ensure rigority and consistency. Recommendations to monitor assessors and moderate work, create guidelines for assessors, ensure students so have appropriate experience, when teaching, make evidence require overt. Current process has practical assessment (APL, portfolio etc.) and theory (fully online with 'branched'quizzes including revision content where required). Uses Google drive supported by Teacher Blackboard (NZ developed teaching platform).Assignments revolve around students completing powerpoint slides. Discussed advantages and disadvantages of the shift to blended / online platform. Presented future plans to improve.
Then my session on 'learning a trade' to share the literature, findings, recommendations and resources (poster and video) with participants. Feedback on the draft resources gathered to inform final version. Presentation here.
Last plenary / panel session on effective mentoring and peer support. With Anne Alkema on 'peer support for trainees in the health and community sector: building a sustainable learning model';
Sandra Johnson from Downer NZ on 'mentoring model for ITOs and employers'; and Dr. Lesley Petersen and Mike Styles and Marianne Farrell from the Primary ITO on 'evaluating a voluntary mentoring programme for trainees in the primary ITO. Each presented their experience / project and questions followed.
All in a varied programme with emphasis on support /pastoral care structures for learners in a range of learning contexts. Not as many people this year, an outcome of the continual restructures in the ITO sector, now mostly complete. As outcomes of TRoQ are worked through with new programmes of study, the VET sector is now perhaps now looking forward to a more settled few years, working through various challenges of assisting vocational learners.
Monday, October 20, 2014
NZ Vocational Education and Training Research Forum - Day 1
At the annual NZ Vocational Education and Training Research forum today and tomorrow. The forum is a held a little later this year then previous years. Good to catch up with various industry training organisation representatives.
The conference begins with a mihi and welcome from ITF CE Mark Oldenshaw. The first conference keynote is with Rosalie Staggard from Innovation and Business Skills in Australia. She presents on the topic 'identifying key capabilities for VET practitioners'. Framework for VET practitioners capability development developed 2013. Capability framework to support the efficient and strategic management of the workforce ensuring all human resource functions and activities are aligned and focused on what is important to organisational success. Provided rationale for developing a capability framework and the process of producing a national Australian VET practitioners framework. Framework has 3 levels, 4 domains and 6 skill areas. Framework is supported by a 'tools' resource. Levels related to educator skills and experience - level 1 are beginners (level 4 cert), level 2 (diploma level) more experienced and level 3 in leadership type roles. Current qualifications mapped to framework to find out if qualifications meet needs and if any gaps. For each domain and skill area, the levels are detailed. Note levels are not equated with experience but capability. Domains are teaching, assessment, industry and community collaboration and systems and compliance. Capabilities are identified for each domain. Eg. for teaching domain, learning theories, design etc.
After morning tea, the short 20 minute concurrent sessions begin. first up with Dr. Linda Bonne, from NZCER on 'the textbook is just the textbook: How builders, GP doctors and engineers are integrating theory and practice. Reports on the 'knowing practice' research team with Karen Vaughan, Jan Eyre & Sally Robertson. Broader approach taken in the project to widen the traditional association of practice -based learning with apprenticeships. Used model by Evans, Guile,, Harris & Allan (2010) putting knowledge to work: A new approach. Nurse Education Today 30(3), 245-251. Interviews with building apprentices, training advisors, trainers, BCITO reps.; GP teachers, registrars, medical educators; and Engineering cadets, mentors, team leaders, managers and IPENZ reps. Compared the contexts to distil commonalities and differences. Trying to understand how skills learning is mediated across the contexts with different approaches to training. Shared some of the evidence gathered by apprentices, GPs and engineers, recording their work learning. Used critical incident narratives - tell us how you integrate theory and practice learning? to engage and assist participants to explain their experiences. Themes were being able to see something bigger, taking on responsibilities and solving complex problems. Learning from experience is not automatic and requires learners to 'structure' and deliberately practice.
Second session with Terry Weblemoe form AUT University with 'teaching therapeutic skills online'. Presented rationale for teaching the subject. A collaborative project between AUT and Youthline. Both have different perspectives and to provide learning on-line to a largely 'relational' and dispositional skill set challenging. Also move from didactic to interactive learning and collaboration.
Then Chantal Pillay, from Le Cordon Bleu School with 'students' reflections on work-integrated learning in the culinary arts'. Provided background of formation of Le Cordon Bleu and it's programme - Bachelor of Culinary Arts and Business - not to train chefs but graduates with strong culinary background focused on business management. Currently programme is into second year. Study focused on students expectations and perceptions of WIL and the effectiveness of WIL. Qualitative case study pre and post with semi-structured survey, student reflective reports and participant observations, analysed thematically using nVivo. Only 3 students between 18 - 28. Findings supported efficacy of WIL for students, revealed WIL challenges.
Final concurrent session this morning, Denis Keys from Bay of Plenty Poly. on 'choice but challenging: how carpentry students and tutors have responded to an ePortfolios project'. Presented using clips from their Ako Aotearoa project - reported in the form of a video - to report on the work undertaken using project-based focus. Provided background and rationale for the approach. The details on how assessments were developed to support the project-based focus. Provided example of a student's eportfolio.
After lunch, Dr. Nicky Murray and Joel Rewa-Morgan present on 'Connecting research and action: Pacifika voices at the heart of the matter'. Provided background of Careerforce and reasons for undertaken the study. Research undertaken with input from participants, a listening exercise. An 'ideal state' presented to participants and stakeholders after distilling the contributions into 'themes' and learning from literature. Ideal stated includes respectful relationships, pastoral support, cultural acknowledgement, community and family and celebrating success. review of where Careerforce is with 'present state'. Action then to 'bridge the divide' between ideal and present states. Be goal focused, achieve easy wins, undertake change management and plan, monitor and evaluate.
Next up, 'achieving success in the Pasifika trades initiative at Weltec' with Tavita Filemoni , Dr, Lisa Wong and Dr. John Horrocks. Evaluative approach taken to find out what works and what does not. 27 interviews with students, Pasifika community, support and teaching staff plus results from ALNTs and programme results. One success factor was to find out what students aspired to becoming and then how to assist them to eventually become (citing findings from first year apprentices project on belonging and becoming). Contributions from the community also important to assist individual students who required support. Insitutional support around celebrating Pacific events and providing visibility to Pasifika through linking with other students, staff and a 'feel at home' environment. Weltec now has Pacific strategy and planning further expansion of the Pasifika centre. Whole institution support undertaken to raise Pasifika engagement, work readiness (assist students to obtain drivers licence), increase literacy and numeracy and help broker work at the end of programme.
Third round of concurrent sessions. I catch up with Dr. James McKay and Emma McLaughlin's work on the language of the trades project, an Ako Aotearoa National project. Reporting on progress to date, 6 months into a 3 year project. Presented rationale and some indication of initial data collected. Edwards, Minty & Miller, 2013) say vocational learning vocabulary as complex and not very much actually known. Interviews with students, tutors and industry. So far 23 trades tutors, class observations in automotive, carpentry, electrical and plumbing. Recordings of classroom conversations. Analysis of electrotech text - reveals 62% 1000 word list, 22% technical, 8% academic and 8% in 2000 list. Learners need to understand and use the words of their trade .Vocabulary, visual / oral communication and behaving all inter-connnected. Gee 1990 - ways of communicating, thinking, believing, valuing and behaving that identity you as part of a specific social group. Literacies related to written (job cards, builders' diary), visual /spatial (plans, representations of abstract concepts - electrical diagrams). Common problems for students with diagrams include interpretation of the elements, transferring ideas from 2 to 3 dimensions and relating circuit diagrams to actual. Shared future work.
Then, 'building foundation learners' literacy and numeracy: the role of formative assessment feedback with Dr. Linda Bonne from NZCER. Concentrated on how ALNET being used. Important to drill deeper into how the educator-learner ' feedback conversations are deployed. Socio-cultural view of learning used with learners as active participants in learning. Need to privilege the learner voice which is rarely represented in the literature. Online survey of youth guarantee learners and tutors with six providers. Trying to trace if effective learning conversations are being undertaken. interim results shared.
Afternoon session after tea are plenary sessions on culturally responsive practice with a series of three short presentations. First up, Tania Mullane and Kihi Tawhai from Waiariki on 'harnessing the potential of innovative curriculum, teaching and learning practice in foundation learning'. Evolution and revolution of programme design to meet needs of foundation learners. Selected a series of practical and theory units and embedded relevant literacy and numeracy standards, Situated learning in the marae. 16 weeks foundation followed by vocational skills for rest of the year through vocational pathways.Good outcomes achieved with new programme.
Secondly, Anne Greenhalg from Workforce Development Ltd. follows with the topic - 'Paunga te matapae oranga : Puanga, the instigation of vitality!' presents on work taking place within the corrections department. Presented the realities of the context and challenges. Presented the support structures required to support educators
Last session today 'Lead-engage-innov8: Finding k(new) momentum for rangatahi in industry training' with Glenda Taihuna from Te Wananga o Aotearoa.
A networking session closes a busy day. At the session, launch of new ITF work on workplace learning anchors the session.
The conference begins with a mihi and welcome from ITF CE Mark Oldenshaw. The first conference keynote is with Rosalie Staggard from Innovation and Business Skills in Australia. She presents on the topic 'identifying key capabilities for VET practitioners'. Framework for VET practitioners capability development developed 2013. Capability framework to support the efficient and strategic management of the workforce ensuring all human resource functions and activities are aligned and focused on what is important to organisational success. Provided rationale for developing a capability framework and the process of producing a national Australian VET practitioners framework. Framework has 3 levels, 4 domains and 6 skill areas. Framework is supported by a 'tools' resource. Levels related to educator skills and experience - level 1 are beginners (level 4 cert), level 2 (diploma level) more experienced and level 3 in leadership type roles. Current qualifications mapped to framework to find out if qualifications meet needs and if any gaps. For each domain and skill area, the levels are detailed. Note levels are not equated with experience but capability. Domains are teaching, assessment, industry and community collaboration and systems and compliance. Capabilities are identified for each domain. Eg. for teaching domain, learning theories, design etc.
After morning tea, the short 20 minute concurrent sessions begin. first up with Dr. Linda Bonne, from NZCER on 'the textbook is just the textbook: How builders, GP doctors and engineers are integrating theory and practice. Reports on the 'knowing practice' research team with Karen Vaughan, Jan Eyre & Sally Robertson. Broader approach taken in the project to widen the traditional association of practice -based learning with apprenticeships. Used model by Evans, Guile,, Harris & Allan (2010) putting knowledge to work: A new approach. Nurse Education Today 30(3), 245-251. Interviews with building apprentices, training advisors, trainers, BCITO reps.; GP teachers, registrars, medical educators; and Engineering cadets, mentors, team leaders, managers and IPENZ reps. Compared the contexts to distil commonalities and differences. Trying to understand how skills learning is mediated across the contexts with different approaches to training. Shared some of the evidence gathered by apprentices, GPs and engineers, recording their work learning. Used critical incident narratives - tell us how you integrate theory and practice learning? to engage and assist participants to explain their experiences. Themes were being able to see something bigger, taking on responsibilities and solving complex problems. Learning from experience is not automatic and requires learners to 'structure' and deliberately practice.
Second session with Terry Weblemoe form AUT University with 'teaching therapeutic skills online'. Presented rationale for teaching the subject. A collaborative project between AUT and Youthline. Both have different perspectives and to provide learning on-line to a largely 'relational' and dispositional skill set challenging. Also move from didactic to interactive learning and collaboration.
Then Chantal Pillay, from Le Cordon Bleu School with 'students' reflections on work-integrated learning in the culinary arts'. Provided background of formation of Le Cordon Bleu and it's programme - Bachelor of Culinary Arts and Business - not to train chefs but graduates with strong culinary background focused on business management. Currently programme is into second year. Study focused on students expectations and perceptions of WIL and the effectiveness of WIL. Qualitative case study pre and post with semi-structured survey, student reflective reports and participant observations, analysed thematically using nVivo. Only 3 students between 18 - 28. Findings supported efficacy of WIL for students, revealed WIL challenges.
Final concurrent session this morning, Denis Keys from Bay of Plenty Poly. on 'choice but challenging: how carpentry students and tutors have responded to an ePortfolios project'. Presented using clips from their Ako Aotearoa project - reported in the form of a video - to report on the work undertaken using project-based focus. Provided background and rationale for the approach. The details on how assessments were developed to support the project-based focus. Provided example of a student's eportfolio.
After lunch, Dr. Nicky Murray and Joel Rewa-Morgan present on 'Connecting research and action: Pacifika voices at the heart of the matter'. Provided background of Careerforce and reasons for undertaken the study. Research undertaken with input from participants, a listening exercise. An 'ideal state' presented to participants and stakeholders after distilling the contributions into 'themes' and learning from literature. Ideal stated includes respectful relationships, pastoral support, cultural acknowledgement, community and family and celebrating success. review of where Careerforce is with 'present state'. Action then to 'bridge the divide' between ideal and present states. Be goal focused, achieve easy wins, undertake change management and plan, monitor and evaluate.
Next up, 'achieving success in the Pasifika trades initiative at Weltec' with Tavita Filemoni , Dr, Lisa Wong and Dr. John Horrocks. Evaluative approach taken to find out what works and what does not. 27 interviews with students, Pasifika community, support and teaching staff plus results from ALNTs and programme results. One success factor was to find out what students aspired to becoming and then how to assist them to eventually become (citing findings from first year apprentices project on belonging and becoming). Contributions from the community also important to assist individual students who required support. Insitutional support around celebrating Pacific events and providing visibility to Pasifika through linking with other students, staff and a 'feel at home' environment. Weltec now has Pacific strategy and planning further expansion of the Pasifika centre. Whole institution support undertaken to raise Pasifika engagement, work readiness (assist students to obtain drivers licence), increase literacy and numeracy and help broker work at the end of programme.
Third round of concurrent sessions. I catch up with Dr. James McKay and Emma McLaughlin's work on the language of the trades project, an Ako Aotearoa National project. Reporting on progress to date, 6 months into a 3 year project. Presented rationale and some indication of initial data collected. Edwards, Minty & Miller, 2013) say vocational learning vocabulary as complex and not very much actually known. Interviews with students, tutors and industry. So far 23 trades tutors, class observations in automotive, carpentry, electrical and plumbing. Recordings of classroom conversations. Analysis of electrotech text - reveals 62% 1000 word list, 22% technical, 8% academic and 8% in 2000 list. Learners need to understand and use the words of their trade .Vocabulary, visual / oral communication and behaving all inter-connnected. Gee 1990 - ways of communicating, thinking, believing, valuing and behaving that identity you as part of a specific social group. Literacies related to written (job cards, builders' diary), visual /spatial (plans, representations of abstract concepts - electrical diagrams). Common problems for students with diagrams include interpretation of the elements, transferring ideas from 2 to 3 dimensions and relating circuit diagrams to actual. Shared future work.
Then, 'building foundation learners' literacy and numeracy: the role of formative assessment feedback with Dr. Linda Bonne from NZCER. Concentrated on how ALNET being used. Important to drill deeper into how the educator-learner ' feedback conversations are deployed. Socio-cultural view of learning used with learners as active participants in learning. Need to privilege the learner voice which is rarely represented in the literature. Online survey of youth guarantee learners and tutors with six providers. Trying to trace if effective learning conversations are being undertaken. interim results shared.
Afternoon session after tea are plenary sessions on culturally responsive practice with a series of three short presentations. First up, Tania Mullane and Kihi Tawhai from Waiariki on 'harnessing the potential of innovative curriculum, teaching and learning practice in foundation learning'. Evolution and revolution of programme design to meet needs of foundation learners. Selected a series of practical and theory units and embedded relevant literacy and numeracy standards, Situated learning in the marae. 16 weeks foundation followed by vocational skills for rest of the year through vocational pathways.Good outcomes achieved with new programme.
Secondly, Anne Greenhalg from Workforce Development Ltd. follows with the topic - 'Paunga te matapae oranga : Puanga, the instigation of vitality!' presents on work taking place within the corrections department. Presented the realities of the context and challenges. Presented the support structures required to support educators
Last session today 'Lead-engage-innov8: Finding k(new) momentum for rangatahi in industry training' with Glenda Taihuna from Te Wananga o Aotearoa.
A networking session closes a busy day. At the session, launch of new ITF work on workplace learning anchors the session.
Monday, October 13, 2014
Mimetic learning at work: book summary
Professor Stephen Billett’s latest book,
summarises some of the work undertaken through his Australian Research Council
Future Fellowship on practice-based learning. This book – Mimetic learning atwork: Learning in the circumstances of practice (2014) and published by
Springer - provides a timely contemporary discussion on the main method humans use
to learn practices i.e. observation, imitation and practice – aka mimetic
learning.
The book is a concise 100 plus pages
divided into 5 chapters. Each chapter has references and is written to be
‘stand alone’. There is a short index and preface providing background to the
work.
Chapter 1 – ‘mimetic learning at work’
provides definitions for mimesis and mimetic learning to anchor the book’s
argument. Mimesis is taken to be “the active process of engaging (e.g.
observing), imitating and rehearsing required performances, which constitutes
microgenetic development – the processes of moment-by-moment learning” (p 6).
Mimetic learning is defined as “the inter- and intra—psychological processes that
constitute order and contribute to mimesis” (p 6). Inter- psychological
processes are socio-cultural contributions to learning (from peers, other
workers, experts, teachers etc. etc.) and intra-psychological indicates
processes used by individuals to learn. The conceptual premises for the book
are also presented: these are
·
Learning and development as
separate
·
Co-ocurrences of work and
learning
·
Co-ocurrence of learning and
remaking culture
·
Individuals as social
·
Social genesis of occupational
knowledge
·
Limits of educational discourse
and science
The first chapter also provides brief one
paragraph summaries of each of the other chapters.
Chapter 2 summarises ‘learning through
practice across human history’ utilising examples from Mesopotamian, Ancient
Greek and Chinese historical sources. In sum, the chapter presents the long
history of mimetic learning through human endeavour as compared to the very
short history of ‘schooled’ learning. In particular, occupational competencies
have primarily been learnt ‘by doing’ and in authentic work environments, not
through schooling.
Chapter 3 provides the foundation for
understanding why mimetic learning can be used to explain much of what takes
place in work and lifelong learning. The rationale for recognition of mimetic
learning as the main way humans have learnt and the need to understand how
mimetic learning occurs across specialised occupations are discussed in this
chapter.
Chapter 4 discusses ‘supporting mimetic
learning: practice curriculum, pedagogies and epistemologies’. Here
recommendations from the studies undertaken through the previous 3 chapters are
used to extend Billett’s conceptualisations of the practice curriculum practice
pedagogies and practice epistemologies. Practice curriculum explains the conduct,
context and objectives of occupations, are laid out to meet the ways of doing
of practice communities. Examples of various approaches taken by individual
workplaces practicing the same occupation used to support the argument i.e
hairdressing apprentices ‘curriculum’ in various types of salons. Practice
pedagogies deployed to learn work practices defer from ‘teaching’ approaches in
formal learning environments due to the nature of work. Personal epistemologies
are proposed to be individualistic as each person comes into an occupation with
idiosyncratic personal history, makes meaning from their work experiences in
different ways and implements their practice to fit into socio-historic work
environment.
The final chapter discusses the
implications arising from the recommendations and conceptualisations argued for
and presented in chapter 4. The goals for mimetic learning are refined and
presented. Implications for workplace practices and educational programmes are
presented and discussed. The chapter closes with discussion on how mimetic
learning could support learning for and through work.
The recommendations for support of practice
curriculum, practice pedagogies and personal epistemologies are provided. For
the practice curriculum, recommendations are included to assist with the design
and deployment of the intended curriculum (identify from the outset, what is to
be learnt through practice-based experiences; helping students to align their
experiences with the intended learning outcomes; aligning the extend and
duration of work experience with educational intentions i.e. academic
literacies, where do they fit with work? And use institutional learning time to
assist students with consolidating and reflecting on what was learnt at work).
For the enacted curriculum there is a need to account for students’ readiness
and prepare students for work with the need to provide some students with
additional or specific experiences; maximise available opportunities for work
placement (i.e. for the present, to use the Christchurch rebuilt as a learning
resource); and to ‘think outside of the square’ as to what constitutes work placement. For the experienced curriculum, assist
student to bring their ‘interest’ into alignment with future work
potentialities; support students before, during and after placements; and
especially support students to deal with challenging aspects of their chosen
profession.For the pedagogical practices, a range of
support structures to support mimetic learning are proposed prior to, during
and after practice-based / workplace experiences.
In all, the book represents a concise but
thorough representation of Billett’s scholarship on mimetic learning's
contribution to human development. There has been a need for this book for some
time as higher education is being continually pushed to rationalise graduate
outcomes. One strategy has been to increase work-integrated learning to
increase graduates’ integration of theory and practice. In turn, to improve work
readiness on graduation. Learning at work has also needed a firmer foundation
to understand how learning occurs. Mimetic learning provides common ground to
understanding how work place learning is enacted across a variety of work
environments.
Friday, October 03, 2014
NTLT 2014 - day 3
Wet day with strong, cold southerlies accompanied by hail and sleet and potential for snow! Last day of a busy conference with good opportunity to network with educators and staff educators / educational developers. The morning begins with a keynote from Donna Bowman, SIT hairdressing tutor awarded last year's hairdressing ITO tutor of the year award. Donna shares her teaching with 'keeping it real'. Couched her presentation around her story from leaving school to teaching hairdressing. Authentic learning formed basis for her own learning the hairdressing trade and her teaching practice. How to share and pass own passion for craft and trade to learners requires helping learners to develop empathy for clients. How learning from literacy and numeracy contributed to new learning about teaching and learning. Shared strategies used to assist reluctant learners to learn crucial trade skills involving literacy and numeracy and life skills required to cope with challenging work environments.
After morning tea, one round of parallel sessions and I catch Dr. Peter Coolbear's (director of Ako Aotearoa) session updating on the work in progress in developing the NZ Adult and Tertiary teacher education qualifications as outcome of the NZQA MRoQ (mandatory review of qualifications) process. A dual professional model frames the development of these qualifications. Landscape of qualifications in draft and in process of discussions with NZQA on process for development of the actual qualifications. Base qualification is a level 5 qualification Certificate in Adult and Tertiary teaching and on to level 6 for specialist qualifications. The new landscape reduces 84 qualifications and reduced to 24. Discussed trade-offs, constraints and opportunities provided by the new proposal. Level 4 Certificates 40 credits for trainers and community educators. Level 5 60 credits minimum teaching qualification for ITP tutors. Level 6 120 credits for leaders in tertiary teaching. Specialisations at level 6 are 60 credits in quality assurance, learning design, educational technology, pasifika teaching and assessment or educators taking on leadership roles in these areas.
Keynote from Peter follows. Peter covers 'making effective use of student feedback on innovative practice to improve educational outcomes'. How does finding out learner's progress fits into the increasingly complex policy environment. We are now into 3rd age of education. 1st age where education was only for the elite and the aristocracy. 2nd age from 1950s onwards marks the massificaion of educaiton. Presently, 3rd age is a transactional era - governments are unable to fund demand for higher / tertiary ed. and now requires evidence of 'outcomes' to substantiate public spending. Presented Ako Aotearoa work on evidence garnered so far and influences, impact and future prospects. Selection of measure is important - see publication - gathering evidence of learner benefit - and need to convert data to applicable intervention or relevant to substantiate submissions, reporting and proposals. Provided examples (good and not so good). Examples included using critical incident methodologies to find out factors enhancing success for Maori learners in the health sciences; excellence in tertiary teaching award examples; dedicated educational units nursing; good practice grants by Michael Mintrom and Caro McCaw. Discussed challenges of process. Recommends 'unlocking the impact of tertiary teachers' perceptions of student evaluations of teaching' .
Conference closes just after noon. I join a few other tutors on a bus trip to Bluff before catching the plane home in the early evening.
Thursday, October 02, 2014
NTLT conference - day 2
Day two dawns much cooler than yesterday, with light rain. A breakfast meeting with other staff development teams begins a busy day.
The MC today is Mike Grumball, head of trades at SIT. First keynote of the day is with Dr. Ganesh Nana, chief economist at the business and economic reseach ltd. (BERL). Ganesh presents on the topic 'tertiary education, value and the 21st century economy'. Provided an overview of where the present world economies are -using examples from rising values in stock markets around the world but unemployment high in many countries (esp. in Europe) and disparities between the well off and the less so (i.e. inequality increasing). Challenges in the new world include climate change, access to energy / raw materials, water, food and skilled labour. Reviewed economics with respect to how 'value' may be defined. Economics is wide ranging including social / political sphere. Economics is about how we choose to use resources (wealth) to generate more valus - produce/deliver things we want, need desire, look after, maintain, or replenish resources and improve and or expand resources (i.e. a sustainable view). Value is difficult to define in dollars and cents but policy advisers require a measurement of value. Measures beyond GDP include UN human development (old) and OECD better life initiative and OECD well-being framework. In NZ, Treasury has recently developed the treasury living standards framework which includes - economic growth, sustainability for the future, increasing equity, social infrastructure and reducing risks (to generate through increases in financial/physical, natural, social and human capital). Education contribute to all aspects of the treasury living standards framework. NZ spending on education (also tertiary) slightly below OECD average. At present, inputs (maximum no. of students) and outputs (maximise no. of graduates) measured and now working on 'outcomes' - still difficult to measure and skewered to economic outcomes (employment, higher income, better access to skilled employees). Current funding incentives are on course completion, qualification completion, student retention and student progression (still outputs). However Tertiary strategies include delivering skills for industry, getting at risk young people into career, boost maori / pacifica completions etc. moving towards 'outcomes' but difficult to measure. Recommends gather data on post-graduate outcomes (beyond just the economic) and explore indicators of broader outcomes.
After morning tea, I attend session with Christine Dunn on 'embracing technologies to enhance nursing engagement and learning in summative assessment'. Christine had trialled ipads with communications courses as per CPIT use of video to support learning of therapeutic communications. Assessment of application of effective communication to therapeutic relationships. Students are provided with a scenario, sign into a youtube account, then participate in a 5-6 minute simulated interview with a'client'. Interview is videotaped and uploaded to youtube. Leaners review their interview, reflected on their performance and develop an improvement plan. Learning from project used to improve next iteration.
Next presentation is with Ruby Day from Wintec on 'pursuing authenticity in designing learning spaces to engage foundation students. Went through the principles underpinning re-design to make the learning more student centred, build life long learning skills and create a positive class culture. Provided background on course / student profiles etc. Applied project based learning with process of developing principles, change management focus, selection of modules to integrate, work with teaching team. Goal was to establish motivation and retain engagement. Projects included setting up students' personal profile, personal learning plan and a community (group) and an individual vocationally focused project. Projects were diverse with regards to topics, focusses and levels.
Then, I facilitate workshop on 'implementing active learning with tablets' as a follow up to yesterday's keynote. Mainly to establish if participant's projects were learner-focused and to work on how implementation may progress. The need to plan the course / programme with objectives, learning activities, opportunity to receive feedback / reflect and work on next learning objective.
After lunch, there is keynote with Professor Angus McFarlane from University of Canterbury on 'Mai I te ao tawhito ki te ao hou: cultural touchstones for higher education in today's world'. Presentation centred around the importance of touchstones with regards to democracy and diveity with the tertiary education. Consider continuums of 'cultural consciousness', the main dangers of 'Eurocentric hegemony' and present an argument to favour culturally connected discourses in research and teaching. Presented a set of 5 influences for culturally inclusive pedagogy and propose a process that has potential to build on existing scientific and cultural imperatives for a place in the new world. Challenged us to think about how we are being culturally competent. To prepare students to become culturally conscious, with educational direction coming from the traditional Eurocentric and Te Ao Maori. Need to have equity not just equality.
Workshops in 4 streams and I attend the presentation with Stephen Atkins, Chris Fraser and Lyn Blair with 'problem based learning at Otago Polytechnic: developing a research programme'. First year Business degree students enrol in the problem-based learning programme and complete the equivalent of 8 papers. Details of the structure and philosophies of the programme presented. Then workshop to move through 4 'stations' to experience problem-based learning. Wrap up of the session closes the session. PBL programme has 5 projects - business tool kit, business practices, giving back, environmental issues and business venture plus 'gap fill' finals. 50% individual and 50% group assessment reported as individual 8 paper results. PBL students have less lecture time but more time to work on projects. Project individual and group assessments mapped to all the learning outcomes from the 8 courses.
Afternoon keynote is with Manu Fasea-Semeatu who is national facilitor for CORE education presents on 'Le lalolagi fou:E tumau le fa'avae, ae fesuia'i faiga - understanding the diverse-cities of Pasifika'. An engaging presentation to introduce the work by CORE Pacifica team to support Pacifica education, learners and Pacifica educators PD for technology enhanced learning. Objective to implement Pacifica vision - all Pacifica learners participating, engaging and achieving in education, secure their identities and cultures. Need to remember, Pacifica has multiple cultures, some commonalities but each has specific wealth of culture. Shared strategies used as a teacher to engage Pacifica learners, challenging them to succeed, achieve excellence and become leaders. Moved into theories / hypothesis towards conception of 'diverse-city' - iversity in Pacifica peoples' belonging and involvement with their Pacifica roots. Presented CORE education themes - personalised learning, new views of equity, diversity and inclusion, using curriculum knowledge, rethink the role of learners and teachers (ako), culture of continuous learning and new kinds of partnerships and relationships. Recommended to list 5 actions to take to become Pacifica responsive, identify what you need to do the achieve the actions and set an timeline. Big CORE ideas are diversity, connectedness (check CORE connected educator month october 2014). Reach before you teach :)
Conference dinner at Cabbage Tree restaurant closes a long but interesting day.
The MC today is Mike Grumball, head of trades at SIT. First keynote of the day is with Dr. Ganesh Nana, chief economist at the business and economic reseach ltd. (BERL). Ganesh presents on the topic 'tertiary education, value and the 21st century economy'. Provided an overview of where the present world economies are -using examples from rising values in stock markets around the world but unemployment high in many countries (esp. in Europe) and disparities between the well off and the less so (i.e. inequality increasing). Challenges in the new world include climate change, access to energy / raw materials, water, food and skilled labour. Reviewed economics with respect to how 'value' may be defined. Economics is wide ranging including social / political sphere. Economics is about how we choose to use resources (wealth) to generate more valus - produce/deliver things we want, need desire, look after, maintain, or replenish resources and improve and or expand resources (i.e. a sustainable view). Value is difficult to define in dollars and cents but policy advisers require a measurement of value. Measures beyond GDP include UN human development (old) and OECD better life initiative and OECD well-being framework. In NZ, Treasury has recently developed the treasury living standards framework which includes - economic growth, sustainability for the future, increasing equity, social infrastructure and reducing risks (to generate through increases in financial/physical, natural, social and human capital). Education contribute to all aspects of the treasury living standards framework. NZ spending on education (also tertiary) slightly below OECD average. At present, inputs (maximum no. of students) and outputs (maximise no. of graduates) measured and now working on 'outcomes' - still difficult to measure and skewered to economic outcomes (employment, higher income, better access to skilled employees). Current funding incentives are on course completion, qualification completion, student retention and student progression (still outputs). However Tertiary strategies include delivering skills for industry, getting at risk young people into career, boost maori / pacifica completions etc. moving towards 'outcomes' but difficult to measure. Recommends gather data on post-graduate outcomes (beyond just the economic) and explore indicators of broader outcomes.
After morning tea, I attend session with Christine Dunn on 'embracing technologies to enhance nursing engagement and learning in summative assessment'. Christine had trialled ipads with communications courses as per CPIT use of video to support learning of therapeutic communications. Assessment of application of effective communication to therapeutic relationships. Students are provided with a scenario, sign into a youtube account, then participate in a 5-6 minute simulated interview with a'client'. Interview is videotaped and uploaded to youtube. Leaners review their interview, reflected on their performance and develop an improvement plan. Learning from project used to improve next iteration.
Next presentation is with Ruby Day from Wintec on 'pursuing authenticity in designing learning spaces to engage foundation students. Went through the principles underpinning re-design to make the learning more student centred, build life long learning skills and create a positive class culture. Provided background on course / student profiles etc. Applied project based learning with process of developing principles, change management focus, selection of modules to integrate, work with teaching team. Goal was to establish motivation and retain engagement. Projects included setting up students' personal profile, personal learning plan and a community (group) and an individual vocationally focused project. Projects were diverse with regards to topics, focusses and levels.
Then, I facilitate workshop on 'implementing active learning with tablets' as a follow up to yesterday's keynote. Mainly to establish if participant's projects were learner-focused and to work on how implementation may progress. The need to plan the course / programme with objectives, learning activities, opportunity to receive feedback / reflect and work on next learning objective.
After lunch, there is keynote with Professor Angus McFarlane from University of Canterbury on 'Mai I te ao tawhito ki te ao hou: cultural touchstones for higher education in today's world'. Presentation centred around the importance of touchstones with regards to democracy and diveity with the tertiary education. Consider continuums of 'cultural consciousness', the main dangers of 'Eurocentric hegemony' and present an argument to favour culturally connected discourses in research and teaching. Presented a set of 5 influences for culturally inclusive pedagogy and propose a process that has potential to build on existing scientific and cultural imperatives for a place in the new world. Challenged us to think about how we are being culturally competent. To prepare students to become culturally conscious, with educational direction coming from the traditional Eurocentric and Te Ao Maori. Need to have equity not just equality.
Workshops in 4 streams and I attend the presentation with Stephen Atkins, Chris Fraser and Lyn Blair with 'problem based learning at Otago Polytechnic: developing a research programme'. First year Business degree students enrol in the problem-based learning programme and complete the equivalent of 8 papers. Details of the structure and philosophies of the programme presented. Then workshop to move through 4 'stations' to experience problem-based learning. Wrap up of the session closes the session. PBL programme has 5 projects - business tool kit, business practices, giving back, environmental issues and business venture plus 'gap fill' finals. 50% individual and 50% group assessment reported as individual 8 paper results. PBL students have less lecture time but more time to work on projects. Project individual and group assessments mapped to all the learning outcomes from the 8 courses.
Afternoon keynote is with Manu Fasea-Semeatu who is national facilitor for CORE education presents on 'Le lalolagi fou:E tumau le fa'avae, ae fesuia'i faiga - understanding the diverse-cities of Pasifika'. An engaging presentation to introduce the work by CORE Pacifica team to support Pacifica education, learners and Pacifica educators PD for technology enhanced learning. Objective to implement Pacifica vision - all Pacifica learners participating, engaging and achieving in education, secure their identities and cultures. Need to remember, Pacifica has multiple cultures, some commonalities but each has specific wealth of culture. Shared strategies used as a teacher to engage Pacifica learners, challenging them to succeed, achieve excellence and become leaders. Moved into theories / hypothesis towards conception of 'diverse-city' - iversity in Pacifica peoples' belonging and involvement with their Pacifica roots. Presented CORE education themes - personalised learning, new views of equity, diversity and inclusion, using curriculum knowledge, rethink the role of learners and teachers (ako), culture of continuous learning and new kinds of partnerships and relationships. Recommended to list 5 actions to take to become Pacifica responsive, identify what you need to do the achieve the actions and set an timeline. Big CORE ideas are diversity, connectedness (check CORE connected educator month october 2014). Reach before you teach :)
Conference dinner at Cabbage Tree restaurant closes a long but interesting day.
Wednesday, October 01, 2014
National Tertiary Learning and Teaching Conference - 2014 day 1
At the annual National Tertiary Learning and Teaching Conference, at Southern Institute of Technology (SIT), Invercargill for the next 3 days. Looking forward to catching up with many NZ staff developers and gathering new ideas to share with CPIT colleagues.
dbol
Day one begins with traditional Maori Mihi whakatau, welcomes from conference MC, Sally Dobbs - Academic and Relationship leader (SIT) and SIT CE - Penny Simmonds, Invercargill mayor, Tim Shadbolt. First keynote from Dr. Kerry Reid-Searl - Professor of Nursing from Central Queensland University, with an extension on her keynote from last year. This year, 'Anywhere, anytime: a simulation teaching strategy preparing learners for real world practice beyond the classroom walls'. Challenged teachers to try different and innovative ways to engage students with learning. Introduced the classroom in a small suitcase - based on -simulation - to have a realistic programmes with fidelity and believable. Did a role-play similar to one last year with an elderly patient. Extended on simulation with pedagogical framework - how relationship to 'person' and hearing his journey helps students learn respect and see things from a different perspective. Many dispositional skills including need to learning how to listen and empathise. Mask Ed simulations introduces 9 characters who carry through the 3 years of the nursing programme. Learners build up relationships with the characters, learning by stealth (the hidden educator).
After lunch, attend Aidan Bigham, Trudy Harris and Jackie Messam on 'course design for student centred learning,'. Changed brought about by move into new facilities. Modified OTARA to OSCAR - objectives, success criteria, context, resources. Learning spaces fully flexible with a central 'street' to use whole space or divide into smaller spaces. Team teaching with project based / student based learning. Need to prepare for teaching in a different format, not just concentrate on content. Learning activities are more important to work through than content. Learning around a one semester project to solve engineering problem. Problems based on real-world scenarios or a design brief to be completed by a 'client'.
Then afternoon tea, followed by my keynote on CPIT's experiences with technology enhanced learning (TEL) post-earthquakes with emphasis on our 'project surface tablet' titled - 'flexible and mobile delivery @ CPIT post-2012: Shaken, stirred and poured'. Presentation stressed need to plan, identity learning objective, select pedagogical approach, prepare students and teachers and evaluate and improve as project progresses.
After keynote, a series of 3 sessions. Firstly, Terry Kapua from Waiariki (Rotorua) with 'mobile device education: tino rangitiratanga for learners'. Introduced an iPhone app to learn Maori allowing for pronunciation to be checked. Correct pronunciation provided. Learner records their version and sent best one to learning management system to mark it. Trialing with 80 students and learning pitfalls and ways to help meet the challenges.
Next, John Hitchcock and Gerry Duignan from Weltec on 'growing 21st century tertiary teachers through a career pathway model'. Discussion groups identified professional development as beginning, intermediate ( 1 - 4 years) and 'experienced' (more than 5 years) teachers. Pattern of -how can I be a teacher, how can I understand learning and for more experiences, how can I understand learners and what can I do to help learners learn?? Discussion on what is 21st century learning. From discussion, introduced an academic staff career framework to try to capture and frame professional / capability development for polytechnic tutors.
Last up today, Cath Fraser and Ruth Petersen with 'getting connected: principles and theories that mean any time anywhere works for students'. Introduced the Goalpost resource produced as an Ako Aotearoa resource for tutors. A just in time resource for new tutors to get them up and running and a follow-up from the Signpost resource which was a first stop resource for people starting out as tutors in the NZ polytechnic, wananga and private sector. Two resources are supported by Teaching tips 1 and teaching tips 2 workshops to provide interactive sessions.
Conference that headed to the SIT downtown campus for a'night market' set up by students to showcase their work.
dbol
Day one begins with traditional Maori Mihi whakatau, welcomes from conference MC, Sally Dobbs - Academic and Relationship leader (SIT) and SIT CE - Penny Simmonds, Invercargill mayor, Tim Shadbolt. First keynote from Dr. Kerry Reid-Searl - Professor of Nursing from Central Queensland University, with an extension on her keynote from last year. This year, 'Anywhere, anytime: a simulation teaching strategy preparing learners for real world practice beyond the classroom walls'. Challenged teachers to try different and innovative ways to engage students with learning. Introduced the classroom in a small suitcase - based on -simulation - to have a realistic programmes with fidelity and believable. Did a role-play similar to one last year with an elderly patient. Extended on simulation with pedagogical framework - how relationship to 'person' and hearing his journey helps students learn respect and see things from a different perspective. Many dispositional skills including need to learning how to listen and empathise. Mask Ed simulations introduces 9 characters who carry through the 3 years of the nursing programme. Learners build up relationships with the characters, learning by stealth (the hidden educator).
After lunch, attend Aidan Bigham, Trudy Harris and Jackie Messam on 'course design for student centred learning,'. Changed brought about by move into new facilities. Modified OTARA to OSCAR - objectives, success criteria, context, resources. Learning spaces fully flexible with a central 'street' to use whole space or divide into smaller spaces. Team teaching with project based / student based learning. Need to prepare for teaching in a different format, not just concentrate on content. Learning activities are more important to work through than content. Learning around a one semester project to solve engineering problem. Problems based on real-world scenarios or a design brief to be completed by a 'client'.
Then afternoon tea, followed by my keynote on CPIT's experiences with technology enhanced learning (TEL) post-earthquakes with emphasis on our 'project surface tablet' titled - 'flexible and mobile delivery @ CPIT post-2012: Shaken, stirred and poured'. Presentation stressed need to plan, identity learning objective, select pedagogical approach, prepare students and teachers and evaluate and improve as project progresses.
After keynote, a series of 3 sessions. Firstly, Terry Kapua from Waiariki (Rotorua) with 'mobile device education: tino rangitiratanga for learners'. Introduced an iPhone app to learn Maori allowing for pronunciation to be checked. Correct pronunciation provided. Learner records their version and sent best one to learning management system to mark it. Trialing with 80 students and learning pitfalls and ways to help meet the challenges.
Next, John Hitchcock and Gerry Duignan from Weltec on 'growing 21st century tertiary teachers through a career pathway model'. Discussion groups identified professional development as beginning, intermediate ( 1 - 4 years) and 'experienced' (more than 5 years) teachers. Pattern of -how can I be a teacher, how can I understand learning and for more experiences, how can I understand learners and what can I do to help learners learn?? Discussion on what is 21st century learning. From discussion, introduced an academic staff career framework to try to capture and frame professional / capability development for polytechnic tutors.
Last up today, Cath Fraser and Ruth Petersen with 'getting connected: principles and theories that mean any time anywhere works for students'. Introduced the Goalpost resource produced as an Ako Aotearoa resource for tutors. A just in time resource for new tutors to get them up and running and a follow-up from the Signpost resource which was a first stop resource for people starting out as tutors in the NZ polytechnic, wananga and private sector. Two resources are supported by Teaching tips 1 and teaching tips 2 workshops to provide interactive sessions.
Conference that headed to the SIT downtown campus for a'night market' set up by students to showcase their work.
Monday, September 22, 2014
Learning through readings on neuroscience and neuropsychology
As prefaced in a blog last year, I would be
devoting most of this year to working towards a better understanding of how
recent studies in neuroscience and neuropsychology may contribute to my work on
studying trades-based learning.
I must say the readings have been slightly
disorganised as I meandered from one topic area to another. My self-directed
route through the discursive field of philosophy and empirical studies of
neuroscience show how there is still much to learn about the brain, mind and
soul. Each field pushes a ‘preferred’ way of looking at the world and there are
only a few researchers who seem to push through the boundaries. Examples
include the Churchland’s neurophilosophy.
The siloing of discipline areas is starting to dissolve as articles on
sites like brain.org example. So we are still at the very early stages of understanding
how the brain works and working out how what happens in the brain, contributes
to what makes us who we are.
Books like Owen Flanagan’s "The problem of the soul"’ , Ramachandran's "Tell-tale brain", Precht's "Who am I and if so, how many" and Humphrey's "Soul dust", go some way to explaining to a lay audience, the contributions of
science and the historical Western tradition of theology and humanism towards
our present understanding of "how I am and who I am".
So what have I gleaned from just over a
year’s worth of reading?
· - The brain is incredible, it is
the foundation of who we are and provides the mechanisms to learn how to become
who we are. Hence, guard it well. I now have a new swish-bang cycle helmet to replace
my almost a decade old one, in a bid to ensure the brain box is accorded the protection it deserves.
· - We still do not really know
much about how the mechanics of the brain works. One needs to be careful about
the hype around fMRI and similar towards explaining how we think.
· - Some of what the brain does is
innate or hardwired but much of what eventually ends up as ‘me’ has to be learnt.
The brain’s biological construction is accomplished both through genetic
evolutionary legacies (nature) and
through contributions from our social environment (nurture) (the birth of the
mind)- Hence, there is great
plasticity in the brain (see guitar zero).
·
Which leads to – we need to
want to learn otherwise, things become challenging (Hatties science of how welearn). So intrinsic motivation always beats extrinsic.
· - There are limitations to the
brain (kluge) we need to be aware of and work through. Things like memory, decision
making (see neuroeconomics), our propensity for addiction to substances
offering pleasure etc. all need to be borne in mind.
· - We learn better when we can
relate new learning to pass experiences and things we already know (Hattie - visible learning for teachers)
· - We ‘chunk’ concepts and
remember things multi modally. The sounds, smells and visuals are retrieved
when we bring up memories. The brain does not ‘record’ experiences like a video
recorder but brings experiences in a multisensory / multi modal way into our
existing neural networks. therefore, each person’s memory / perspectives of an
occurrence are idiosyncratic.
· - Narratives, analogies,
metaphors are ways we use to make sense of unfamiliar ideas and incorporate
into our repertoire. However, this
method of making sense of our world means narratives, analogies and metaphors
are personalised to our ontological leanings.
· - The brain does not come with a
‘how to best use’ manual. Individually we need to work things out. So acquiring
metacognition (Hattie - visible learning for teachers) is an one important approach to improving learning.
· - Learning is hard work, takes
time, dedication and resilience (expertise, deliberate practice); there is no
quick fix.
· - When we manage to learn
something new, we find it motivates us to learn more. Learning is maybe
something our brain craves (books on evolutionary psychology)
· - Our brains have a propensity to
learn from others. We are a social animal (Sterelny - evolved apprentice, Vygotsky). What we are and who we are is
lodged in the grey stuff and white matter in our skull, there has not been any empirical
evidence to date that there is a soul – the brain is the mind is the soul (Churchland,
Flanagan).
· - When we die, that’s it L, which seriously challenges my Christian belief system.
·
However, knowing that ourselves
(or soul) cease to exist when our physical part dies means we need to
contribute NOW. So carpe diem!!
· - Humans are the only animal on
earth that can think through a way to remedy the mess our species have made of
the only known planet inhabited by sentient beings – see pale blue dot to be
reminded about how insignificant we are in the really BIG picture.
· - Some other animals may also be
sentient so beware of what you eat.
So, a few epiphanies plus confirmation of
lots already known and applied. New learning and skills attained from wading
through some interesting (and some not so interesting) books and articles
including familiarity with the work of some of the leading researchers in
neuroscience, neuropsychology and neurophilosophy.
Where to next? Well, next year will be focused on how to apply some of the above to
vocational learning and a catch up on readings pertinent to the topic. I need to touch base again with some of the seminal works on apprenticeship learning and workplace learning to sieve through what is still pertinent and what is now already dated, in light of the learnings from this year's readings. So the journey continues.
Monday, September 15, 2014
Neuro- The new brain sciences and the management of the mind – book overview
Checked this 2013 book out - authored by N.
Rose and J.M. Abi-Rached and published by Princeton University Press.
I worked through the ebook available
through CPIT library. The book is a good overview of the state of play with
regards to neuroscience, neuropsychology and brings in perspectives and
concepts already summarised in other books – for instance, as overviewed on
this blog recently, by P. Churchland, Ramachandran and Broks.
The book has 9 chapters, an introduction
and conclusion and 7 chapters with each chapter overviewing the ‘functional’
aspects of the brain, implications.
The introduction (available frompublisher’s site) provides a good overview of the book and worth a read through
before diving into the book itself.
Chapter 1 covers the ‘neuromolecular brain’
is the historical overview of how we progressed through the last 100 years or
so in our understanding of how the brain is structured and how it works. A
summary of 8 points in page 43 sums up is presently known. The brain is an
organ like other, evolved like other mammals, can be anatomised at the
molecular level as being chemical transmissions partially dependent on neurotransmitters
and a whole complex of other entities – enzymes, ion channels receptors,
transporters etc. Different parts of the brain have different evolutionary
histories. Mental processes reside in the brain, so mental states and processes
can be potentially observable through the organic function of the brain.
The second chapter is on how the brain sees
the world – ‘the invisible gaze’ summarise the long journey taken to the
present in how to try to unlock what happens in the brain as it functions. From
crude images to present brain scanners and the coloured pictures available
through fMRI.
Chapter 3 is a call to heed research on
humans rather than mice in ‘what’s wrong with mice’ maintains the argument that
study of human brains cannot be completed through making assumptions from
animal studies. For instance, page 84 has 6 points which include difficulties
in assuming animals and human behaviour
are the same, although mechanics may be the same, biochemical may defer, difficulties
with phenotypes, modelling human stressors in animals, weakness of current
tests used in animals (mazes) and inferred to human responses, and many trials
are not properly blinded or randomised. Hence, the specificity of humans needs
to be accounted for.
The fourth chapter is a good discussion on
how the brain goes wrong – ‘all in the brain’ covers mental illness and how
brain function / malfunction?. How neuropsychiatry is still a work in progress
and how although we have made many positive discoveries and applied to
treatment, we have only scratched the surface in understanding why and how mental
illness occurs.
Chapter 5 concentrates on the ‘social
brain’ and summarises the work of social neuroscience, trying to understand why
primates are ‘social animals’ and the role of the brain. The specialised area
of social neuroscience is presented and discussed. Includes a thoughtful
critique for and against the role of mirror neurons, their presence and
function and theorised connection to our social nature.
Chapter 6 presents the other side of the
coin ‘the antisocial brain’ and tries to unpack how criminality occurs. A
historical overview of criminality and its associations with psychology,
psychiatry and neuroscience is provided. A slight hiatus after the second world
war due to Nazi research in the area followed by revival of interest from the
1980s with accessibility to CT scans. Cautions are discussed with regards to
neurolaw – using brain science to try to explain (and sometimes provide
defence) criminal behaviour.
Chapter 7 come together with ‘personhood in
the neurobiological age’ with the perennial challenge of where the self comes
from – the soul or the brain? As per previous chapters, the historical journey
towards understanding who we are and the role of the brain is summarised.
The conclusion ‘managing brains, minds and
selves’ brings in the challenge into the future. A glimpse of where to next.
I would not recommend this book as the
first port of call on things neurobiological. It is written with an academic although, in general, readable style. The function of the book is to update the
thousands of studies in the last two decades on brain function and the media
hype around conclusions that may be drawn from ‘brain scanning’ . Therefore,
the book is a more academic version of 'need for caution in using neuroscience findings', reminding one in drawing
conclusions from limited, exploratory studies, many conducted on rats or small
‘building block’ studies which are sensationalised by the media.
Monday, September 08, 2014
Tec-Variety - book overview
eBook by Professor Curtis Bonk and Dr. Elaine Khoo (Waikato University) called "Adding some Tec-Variety - 100 + activities for motivating and retaining learners online".
The book is available via Amazon but the authors have also
generously provided access to a free download of a pdf version of the book. 15 chapters with 10 chapters devoted to the “tec- tools”
framed by 3 introductory and 2 closing / consolidating chapters.
The first chapter introduces the rationale and values for
writing the book. The R2D2 (read, reflect, display, do) components used in an
earlier (2006) book (empowering online learning:100+ activities for reading,
reflecting, displaying and doing by Bonk and Zhang) is also introduced and
discussed. The framework for tec-variety (tone / climate, encouragement,
curiosity, variety, autonomy, relevance, interactivity, engagement, tension and
yielding) also presented and substantiated. Chapter 2 covers the various
literature on on-line learning attrition and retention, leading to the focuses
of the book on setting up the right background for helping learners retain
motivation in an online learning environment. Chapter 3 summaries the key
learning theories’ stance on motivation – behaviourism, cognitivism,
constructivism, social culturalism.
Each of the principles for assisting online learners to
succeed then covered. Each principle recommends 10 learning activities, backed
by examples, exemplars and resources. Principle one is to set up a tone or
climate to ensure learners’ are psychologically safe, comfortable and have a
sense of belonging to the course; Principle 2 covers the encouragements aspects
of learning with feedback, responsiveness, praise and supports. Principle on
curiosity has activities to provide for surprise, intrigue and exploration of
the unknowns. Variety is principle 4 to provide novelty, fun and fantasy. In
the principle on learner autonomy, activities to encourage learner choice,
control, flexibility and opportunities are presented. Relevance is covered to
provide activities for accessing meaningful, authentic and interesting
learning. Interactivity recommends online activities for collaboration,
team-based and community learning. Engagement is assisted by activities to
bring about greater effort, involvement and investment (buy-in). The critical
thinking aspect is addressed in principle 9 on tension with activities that
challenge learners and provide opportunities to work with dissonance and
controversy. The last principle discusses outputs in the form of goal driven,
purposefully visioned and learner-owned evidence production.
Recommended activities cover a range of traditional (variants
of discussion forums) to web-based, multimedia / multimodal type items. The
emphasis is on learning centred activities with the learner contributing and
producing content, either individually or with others, for discussion, critique
and consolidation.
The penultimate chapter covers the important task of
motivating instructors. The last chapter summarises the approaches and offers
tables listing all the various activities and the risks, time, costs, learner-centredness
and activity duration as a ‘selection’ tool.
Overall, a good overview of the possibilities for using a
range of online learning activities, anchored by sound pedagogical rationales.
Monday, September 01, 2014
Neuroeconomics – via Coursera MOOC
Over the last month and a half, I have been working through
a MOOC offered through Coursera. This is part of my professional development
for this year, to augment readings (summarised through this blog this year) in
the areas of neuroscience and neuropsychology.
The MOOC is offered through the Higher School of Economics
which is part of the National Research University located in Moscow. The presenter is Professor Vasily Klucharev.
The course has a traditional structure. Videos each week as lectures – usually
3 – 5 broken up into 5 -6 minutes to 20 minutes. Each video has one set of
multiple choice questions embedded. At the end of each week, a short multiple
choice test is completed. There is a time limit on the quiz and 3 attempts are
allowed. The exam at the end of the course is made up of 20 multiple choice
questions.
The above supplemented with a short collection of suggested
‘readings’ in the form of book chapters and journal articles. There is also an
active discussion forum which I have not had time to delve into but will try to
catch up on at some stage.
Part one introduces the topic. Neuroeconomics is an
interdisciplinary discipline to introduce aspects of psychology and
neuroscience into rationalist economics. The foundation and rationale of
neuroeconomics are introduced.
Week 2 goes through the neuroscience aspects required to
understand how neuroeconomics itself works. Various means of accessing brain
activity as decisions are made are also covered in week 2. Importantly, fMRIprocess is explained so that future graphs and explanations can be understood.
FMRI images are statistical combinations of structural (what is activated) and
functional (how often activated) brain activity. Brain activity is captured
through magnetic resonance of blood flow through the brain as laboratory tests
are completed by test subjects.
Week 3 begins the work on understanding how the brain goes
about making decisions. The concept of a diffusion model for decision making is
introduced and discussed in some depth.
Week 4 introduces the parts of the brain – the nucleusaccumbus (anticipates gain / reward), orbital frontal cortex (compares and
integrates information regarding reward outcomes) and the dorsolateralprefrontal cortex (does the control and planning). Examples are provided of how
each operates and then how all the brain sectors work in tandem to make value
judgements and decisions.
Week 5 brings in the important contributions of emotion into
how decisions are made. Emotions contribute either as innate or learnt
responses. The theory of emotion states we appraise, evaluate, take action,
make physiological changes or express through action. Emotional stimuli is thus
assigned a form of ‘value’ albeit, subjective values. Emotions are also the
product of brain activity and add a subjective dimension to how we make
decisions as how each person comes to a ‘conclusion’ is coloured by the
context, historical-social factors, ontology etc. etc. So, we hope to be
rational thinkers but perhaps we are nowhere near as rational as we would like
to be!
In week 6, the ways in which the brain makes decision either
as option 1 (intuitive, heuristic, automatic) or option 2 (reflective, analytic,
consciously monitored) are introduced. The role of the dorsallateral prefrontal
cortex (DLPFC) is brought in to explain how people modulate their needs through
self-control. Fairness and temporal discounting (delayed rewards) also plays a
role. Therefore, decisions not necessarily rational but impacted on by emotions
and the way various parts of the brain evaluate choices.
Week 7 brings in the contribution of ‘risk’, how does the
brain assess ‘risk’? Is there a difference between risk and uncertainty? The
ways in which we make decisions with an element of inherent risks is predicated
by how the options are framed. We tend to be risk adverse if we see a gain but
risk seeking when faced with a loss! Small probabilities are overweighted and
large probabilities under weighted. Therefore, we will gamble on an outcome
when faced with a losing proposition whereas if we perceive a sure win, we are
conservative.
The last two weeks of the course discusses ‘society and
brains’.
Week 8 discusses the ‘social brain’. Firstly, a video of
‘game theory’, the economics decision making model is presented. Revised the
levels of complexity in neuroeconomics – neuron – brain – cognitions and
emotions – society and biosphere. Social influences seen to be an evolutionary
factor (selection between genes, between individuals within a group and between
groups within a population). Correlation between social complexity and
neo-cortex volume in primates. Game theory used to try to understand situations
where decision-makers interact. Game consists of a set of actions and a payoff
function. Uses ‘prisoners’ dilemma’ to illustrate cooperation. The neurological
fundamentals of social cooperation are summarised with the role of mirror
neurons highlighted.
The last week of the course, brings in the dimensions of
evolution and the concept of humans as ‘economic animals’. The concept of
cooperation as being innate in humans and to a slightly less extend in primates
/ apes is used as example of neuro-based pre-disposal to certain traits.
Biological market theory is used to find out if there are natural examples of
the existence of market type scenarios in nature. For instance ‘cleaners’ /
groomers and ‘clients’ between animals – reef fish or anemones with small
schools of ‘cleaner’ fish. Clients allow cleaners to enter their mouths without
eating them. Monkeys have complex arrangements for grooming, with hierarchical
and supply based systems. Market systems impact on how services are
interchanged. Capuchin monkey experiments can be trained to trade coins for
tools to perform tasks – usually leading to a food reward. Capuchin monkeys
also learn value of coins, trading for ‘bargains’ and ‘gamble’ when loses are
framed as wins (i.e. loss aversion). Both capuchin monkeys and chimpanzees
reject unfair exchanges, indicating the perception of equality to be present in
primates.
Overall, a very traditionally structured course with content
delivered via weekly readings, video lectures, in lecture quizzes usually at
the end of the lecture, multiple choice quizzes at the end of each week that
count towards assessment and discussion forums. Took a couple of lectures to
get used to the professor’s accent but the explanations were clear and
powerpoint visuals usually helpful. The end of week quizzes were of variable
quality, with many written poorly but the standard of multi-choice question
construction did improve, so the lecturer was learning by doing and responding
to student suggestions.
I am now enrolled in a few more courses to the end of this
year to improve my understanding of neurobiology. These courses meet my
individualised learning needs and are useful for professional development but
you need to be committed to watching the hour or so of videos each week, taking
notes, thinking through the information before attempting the quizzes. I would
say I did learn lots of interesting facts and a couple of items I can apply to
current projects. Of note is the opportunity to be introduced to up to date thinking on brain function, albeit, from a specialised point of view.
Labels:
coursera,
decision making,
MOOCs,
neuroeconomics,
neuropsychology,
neuroscience
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)