Reform of Vocational Education (RoVE) - proposal for change

After some delay, the proposals for reversing or changing many of the intentions and outcomes of RoVE have been released for consultation.  The consultation time is short but perspectives and viewpoints are sought on three items.

1) redesigning of the polytechnic (ITP) network to replace the recently established mega institute, Te Pūkenga.

2) two options for industry-led standards-setting and industry training

3) changes in vocational education funding from 2026.

The proposal's rationale and details are found in the 'regulatory impact statement'.

The options for the ITPs include allowing former ITPs who have had a stable financial record, to continue as stand-alone, autonomous institutions and all others to be brought under a federation umbrella with the Open Polytechnic providing a range of systems and resources that smaller polytechnics would struggle to provision. There are therefore advantages for the handful of former ITPs to basically return to their previous iterations. Market competitive forces will become part of the life again for these polytechnics. For others in the federation, the advantages are shared expertise and resources. Open Polytechnic was no doubt selected due to its national reach but it has had little experience with campus-based, hands-on programmes and the danger is that many of the programmes at small polytechnics will become distance learning (with some tutorials perhaps held in regional centres). Given that learners select f2f learning for good reason, foisting distance learning on regional learners is not an equitable solution.

The standards-setting function of Work Development Councils (WDCs) will likely be maintained and several have been doing a good job of 'filling the gaps' by developing qualifications for niche industries which are important sectors of the economy. Industry Training Organisations (ITOs) will perhaps be merged into WDCs (or not) meaning that workbased training is again separately supported. One of the advantages (which did not take place as yet) was to bring both campus and workbased learner support into one entity. It looks like this will now not take place.

Funding is really a key to maintaining a national network of VET provision. Commentators including most recently by ex-Otago Polytechnic CE, Phil Ker and ex-MP and Minister of Education, Steve Maharey, both call for the assurance that the funding system review, will lead to the sustainability of the ITP sector, 

Overall, the proposal is pragmatic, given the scope of work that has to be undertaken. However, there seems to be little advantage, from the learner's point of view (so far) despite lots of funding used to firstly form Te Pūkenga and now, to disestablish it and in many senses, return to the status quo. Option 3 for funding reform will need to be well thought through, otherwise, we return to the state pre-RoVE of a financially unsustainable vocational education system.