CRADLE 2020 - keynote #2 with Professor Monika Nerland

The afternoon sessions were on moderation with focus on voices of sessional academics and support for disabled assessees. Rapid orals were then presented and these covered a range of topics. I did not take notes on these when too quickly.

The closing sessions begin with a keynote from ProfessorMonika Nerland who is Professor of Education at the University of Oslo. She speaks on ‘Reconfiguring relations between higher education and work: Knowledge practices and learning in the (post)digital era’.

The presentation concentrates on how knowledge practices have changed in the workplace and in turn, this impacts on how the processes are recognised as complex work. Examples from professional learning used to explain the various perspectives. Began with an overview of HE and digitalisation. Much attention now focused on digital platforms for learning and communication. Within work, specialised digitalisation processes are now advancing rapidly. There is therefore an extension and complexity of the possible learning spaces which are distributed across activities and resources. Less attention to the digitisation and its effects on work. Yet, as work shifts, work tasks also shift and these require attention and study.

Discussed the concepts of expert communities and how they are characterised by distinct knowledge practices. Professional expertise tends to be recognised by fellow-experts. May rest on different forms of knowledge and ways of knowing that are applicable in different work contexts. Ways of developing, enacting and recognising expertise is embedded in the distinct forms within specialised communities. The actors and networks at play are variable and specific to occupational specialities.

Epistemic practises is the knowledge which is generated and shared in a given field of practice. Includes the socially and interactionally accomplished ways that  the group communicate, justify, assess and legitimise knowledge. They play a crucial role in making knowledge ‘actionable’ and are required to help assemble, translate and represent practice.

In the post digital area has increased epistemic complexity. There is more abstraction in how knowledge is visualised to allow for computation thinking and automation.  This makes it difficult to access these knowledge domains.

Challenges to professional expertise includes the working with advanced technologies and representations as demanding’ increased need for systems understanding; extended responsibilitie for mastering knowledge; and the need to also establish and manage social relations both internally and externally of organisations.

Provided examples from an ongoing project (CORPUS) to study the changing requirements in public services due to the consequences of digitisation in general and specialised occupations. For example, a study of the introduction of ‘smart care tech’ into the health sector’. How is this new process/system developed and how does it evolve as it forms their new professional roles and responsibilities and a new approach to work. Requires system understanding to bring in the many ‘actors’. Listed a few research challenges – access to observing and participating in knowledge practice as a learner; develop specialised expertise; and navigating complex information environments and constructing productive spaces for learning.

So what is the role of HE in supporting the new demands on learning. Need to enrol students in evolving professional knowledge culture – to providing access to and participation in epistemic practices help to make the profession’s ‘machinery’ of knowledge construction more transparent. With learning an ongoing process of becoming rather that predicated on one end point.

Provided case studies in legal, teacher and software engineering education through design of inquiry tasks to help learning identified epistemic practices (learning outcomes) with professional knowledge sources and the ‘transformative’ means for getting there (i.e. signature pedagogies).

Another way is to attend to students’ navigation and ways of constructing spaces for learning – i.e. moving between educational and professional environments. Also a need to keep pace with an evolving field by developing productive relations between sets of epistemic practice in education ad work and to reconfigure educational arrangements, roles and responsibilities to move beyond the education-work divide.

Conclude with a call to move beyond the education – work dichotomy and to understand that professionalism is not a given. It needs to be continually worked on.

The conference closes with the launch of the book ‘ReimaginingUniversity Assessment in a Digital World’ by Emeritus Professor Beverley Oliver (Deakin). See brief notes on book here. 

CRADLE conference 2020 - Session presentations

 

Today’s sessions for CRADLE conference 2020.

Most of the sessions have two presentations. I attend the following:

Then the first session themed ‘learning in a digital world 1’ is with Dr. Adam Brown and Emily Wade from Deakin. They present on ‘Serendipity, imperfection and vulnerability: Harnessing live video for ‘authentic’ teacher performance.

Adam began with providing the theoretical background and approaches.

Proposed the undertaking of ‘the meddlers in the middle’ as the role of the educator as opposed to ‘stage on the sage’ or ‘guide on the side’. Meddlers in the middle reposition the teacher and student as co-directors and co-editors of their social world.

Need to be ‘authentic’ and that authenticity is an effect, not an essence in the context of self-presentation as being performative.

Emily introduced collaborative autoethnography and how digital platforms like Periscope may be used to enable collaborative work. Explained how this was used for their own teaching context and shared reflections on the process.

Very much an academic look into their teaching and a critical reflection into how video impacts on, supports and extends their teaching practice.

 

Session 2: Learning in a digital world 2.

This session chaired by Simon Knight.

On ‘Development of educational tools that enable large-scale ethical empirical research on evaluative judgement' with Dr. Hassan Khosravi from the University of Queensland. Presented on work carried out with others – George Gyamfi, Dr. Barbara Hanna and Dr. Jason Lodge.

Presented on evaluative judgement (EJ), educational tools, conceptual models and examples.

EJ is the capability to make decisions about the quality of work of oneself and others. This skill helps students use feedback effectively, develop expertise in the view and attain autonomy.

 EF revolves around rubrics, self assessment exemplars, feedback, reflection and peer assessment – mostly theoretical.

Educational tools include peer grading and evaluation systems. Most build without the aim of supporting research and they do not allow data harvesting to be undertaken or the set up of controlled experiments. Draws on work of Associate Professor Paul Denny (University of Auckland) on PeerWise and with Professor Neil Heffernan on the ASSISTments ecosystems.

This presentation on the conceptual framework of RIPPLE. Conceptual model described to help promote both EJ and to undertake research on it. System developed for adaptive learning, learnersourcing and peer grading and feedback with EJ strategies of rubrics, self and peer assessment and exemplars. Connected to metrics, experiment design and ethical guidelines and a data repository.

Provides details of the RIPPLE platform.

Shared one study – Can students create high-quality resources? Walked through the process of students creating and evaluating each other’s questions.

The shared a case study and reflections. In general, students’ EJ improved through iterations. Students tended to provide higher ratings when compared to instructors. Found that the rubric criteria may not suit the ‘assessment’ and re-tested new rubric. 

Shared plans for new investigations and encouraged other researchers to make contact to use the tool.

Followed on with George Gyamfi, also from UQ on ‘The effect of rubrics on evaluative judgement: A randomised controlled trial'. As per above presentation, George’s work is completed with Dr. Barbara Hanna and Dr. Hassan Khosravi.

Defined EJ as per previous presentation. Shared work on rubrics (Reddy & Andrade, 2010 and several others) and how these may be used to enhance student learning. These studies tend to be mostly theoretical and does not bring in the perspectives of students.

Overviewed the research methodology and how RiPPLE was used for the study. Participants were undergraduate students (n= 354) learning database principles. The study involved having a control group which completed peer assessments without a rubric and the treatment group which completed peer assessments with a rubric.

Findings indicate rubrics can be a way of influencing how students attend to quality and can impact students’ judgement in assessing the quality of learning resources. However, construct of the rubric is the key! Even without rubrics, learners are able to make judgements but rubrics provided better clarity.

Session three: Assessment of learning 1 :

Session chaired by Zi Yan.

Dr. Sin Wang Chong from the Queen’s University Belfast presented on ‘Student feedback literacy as an ecological construct’. A conceptual look at feedback literacy covering feedback orientation to feedback literacy, feedback literacy in and beyond the classroom and a reconceptualization of the concept. Presentation based on paper published earlier this year.

Shared study on feedback orientation (London & Smither’s 2002) – utility, accountability, social awareness and feedback efficacy. Also Kremmel & Harding (2020) on language literacy – using a spider chart to provide each learners’ literacy. Then Sutton (2012) in conceptualisation of feedback literacy as epistemology (knowing), Ontological (being) and practical (acting). Carless and Boud (2018) appreciate, make judgments, manage affect and take action on feedback. Most recent Carless and Winstone (2020) looking into both teacher and learner feedback literacy.

Feedback literacy is not only a product (Hattie & Timperley, 2007) but also a process (Interpersonal and intrapersonal (Carless & Boud, 2018).

Chong reconceptualised using a ecological perspective (2020 paper) to include the context within which feedback is undertaken (interpersonal, textual, instructional, sociocultural) and the learner’s beliefs, goals, experiences and abilities. Therefore the engagement dimension (as proposed by Carless and Boud – understand feedback, manage affect, make judgment and take action) has added to it the context and individual dimensions(

Introduced the ecological systems theory (EST) as nested or networked EST with micro, meso, exo, macro and chrono systems. Used example from a paper in preparation – process of scholarly peer-review – to explain the framework. Proposed actor-network theory as a means to understand better the inter-connections/inter-relationships of ESTs.

Concluded with implications including how the framework may be applied towards better understanding the contextual and individual contributions to understanding feedback literacy.

The next session is with Dr. Akilu Tadesse from the University of Bergen on ‘Scaffolding feedback in complex dynamic system context: Effect of online interactive learning environments’. Presents on work undertaken with Professors Pai Davidsen and Erling Moxnes. 

 Presented on the 'problem', covered the notion of scaffolding feedback, application of this study and findimgs.

People, even experts, have difficulties in understanding and communicating their understanding of complex dynamic systems. Also difficult to measure improvements in this domain when CDS are difficult to understand.

The study looks into how to enhance students learning of CDS by developing educaitonal feedback to scaffold feedback that supports students learning.

Shared the notion of scaffolding feedback as a continual spiral of building knowledge. Gaps of knowledge are 'filled either by students' own efforts are through support from 'external agents'. 

Used this scaffolding feedback notion to integrate into a personalised and adaptive online learning environment. Learner is presented with a CDS and supported to progress through a sequence of learning activities to attain CDS. 

Shared a 'case study' to help explain the concept of how the platform works. Then presented the research questions - to find out if scaffolding feedback would reduce the gap between existing high and low performing students. Averaged results across 5 tasks. In general, the gap did close as tasks (increasing in complexity) were worked through. 

Overall, a good range of presentations showing the ways digital technologies may be useful in supporting assessments of learning. 

 

 

 

 

 

Emerging approaches to educational research - book summary

Through browsing through another new book in the CPIT library, I started to work through the first few chapters in greater detail. The book is ‘the Sage handbook of workplace learning’ edited by Margaret Malloch, Len Cairns, Karen Evans and Bridget N. O’Connor. Chapter 2 by Professor Paul Hager on ‘theories of workplace learning’ provides a good overview of the three approaches , the theories influenced by psychological theories, socio-cultural theories and post-modern theories. So, time to update my knowledge on the post-modern theories through an ebook from the CPIT library ebook collection. The book is edited by Professor Tara Fenwick, Professor Richard Edwards and Peter Sawchuk and called ‘emerging approaches to educational research’. Fenwick presents a summary at the University of Technology last month.

This book provides a good introduction to why research approaches have shifted and moved towards trying to understanding the diverse nature of learning and the various contexts learning take place in. The book introduces, describes, discusses and evaluates the ‘sociomaterial’ research approaches or ‘four arenas’ for future educational research. The four arenas are complexity theory, cultural historical activity theory (CHATs), actor-network theory and spatiality.

Each of the four arenas is based on recent dissatisfaction with the inability of research frameworks to capture, study and explain ‘how people learn’. Each proposes frameworks / methods to try to account for the many material / non-material contributions towards how learning occurs. There is generally no ‘right or wrong’ answer coming through using any of the four arenas as research frameworks. Hence, the use of ‘post-modern’ as one categorisation for a raft of research approaches that go beyond the usual ‘qualitative/quantitative’ debate.

The common premises of the four arenas are:

Not dependent on the individual as being the sole focal point of study

Challenge relationships/binaries on which our understandings of ‘practice’ are founded

Challenge notions of context as being where the action is and allowing for a wider range of ‘contexts’ to be recognised

do not take reductionist stances but recognise the continuous dynamic nature of learning

acknowledge the complexity and ‘mess’ that represents the ‘real-world’.

Accept that learning is fundamentally difficult to pin down or to explain.

For me, the above represents some of the steps I have taken as a teacher/researcher, moving from trying to grasp the ‘known’ to understanding that the ‘known’ is slippery, dependent not only on context but on social/historical/ontological factors and attempts at explanation are always going to be incomplete. The above also challenge my grounding as a ‘socioculturalist’ in trying to explain learning as an ‘equilibrium’ between social affordances and individual agency with contributions from the various social relationships individuals encounter. Shifting towards a post-modern framework requires unpacking my current belief systems and evaluating another new way of looking at things.

There is a helpful explanation of the terms used in ‘knowing organisations:practice-based approach’ (book by Nicolini, Gherardi and Yanow) by Svabo – titled – ‘materiality in a practice-based approach’ also relevant to the ‘emerging approaches to educational research’ book.