Worked through a short book last weekend, which was wet and non-conducive to outdoor activities of any kind.
The book, by
Christian Madsbjerg, is published in 2017.
The main argument of the book cautions on relying too much
using quantifiable data to make decisions for solving complex problems. There
is a need to ensure humans retain their uniqueness and ability to draw on tacit
knowledge, acquired across life experiences. Machines, artificial intelligences
and robots do not have the biologically sourced ability to tap into
individuals’ idiosyncratically acquired knowledge, to make decisions requiring
creativity and insight.
Some parts of this book do not quite work and most of the
argument is well laid out and sound. Madsbjerg heads
ReD Associates, a strategy
consulting company which uses social researchers (anthropologists,
sociologists, art historians and philosophers) to assist corporates to attain
better attuned information to eventually improve their company’s reach. There
is some irony in this.
Humans’ sensemaking is not just based on quantitative data.
We are embodied beings. We collect, collate, evaluate and act on multi-modal
inputs. All of these, end up being drawn on when we intuit insights which are
sometimes at odds with what quantitative data recommends.
The five principles of sense making are detailed:
Culture – not individuals – focuses on the need to understand
the socio- historical -political arena we live in. So consumer surveys based
on surveys of individuals, requires reading within the larger social framework
various consumers spent their lives in.
Thick data – not just thin data – uses George Soros, at the
time of the early 1990s as a case study to unpack the need for data beyond what
is provided by formal means. That is, the data coming from individual’s life
experiences combined with collaborations with each other. Therefore, the
socio-cultural. Understanding not only the numbers, but how the individuals who
make decisions (politicians, bureaucrats etc.) make decisions which in turn
affect entire country and world economies.
The savannah – not the zoo – again brings in the need to see
the big picture beyond data streams. Heidigger’s concept of ‘being in the
world’ is used as the main framework in this chapter to explain the importance
of a thing and understanding its position in the world.
Creativity – not manufacturing – encourages the need to not
just make something for its own sake, but to make it well. In essence, this
chapter argues for the need to adopt precepts of craftsmanship, although the
word ‘craftsmanship’ is not used. In particular, this chapter critiques the
move in many corporations to ‘design thinking’.
The North Star – not the GPS - uses three stories to support
the need for human input into meeting complex goals. How a facilitator draws on
her finely honed EQ to get the most out of participants when they are in
workshops to improve their ‘managing’. The need of a negotiator who works in
international hostage crisis to understand deeply, the ethos and culture of his
adversaries. The embodied understanding of a winemaker, at one with the
terroir, working towards making the best wine from the grapes she grows.
Overall, the book advocates for the need to better
appreciate what humans bring to the world. Machines are constructed and
developed by humans. They should be tools, not oracles. Education, especially a
humanities-based education, assists humans to better understand the diversity,
complexity and challenges inherent in our world. Technological innovations require balancing with the needs of humanity. Our lives maybe enriched and enhanced by technological tools, but in the end, humans are here to make a difference - not all of which can be measurable.